﻿and 
  types 
  of 
  certain 
  genera 
  of 
  Hymenoftera, 
  53 
  

  

  limited 
  extent 
  by 
  Morice 
  and 
  Durrant 
  in 
  certain 
  instances, 
  

   is 
  not 
  permitted 
  by 
  the 
  Code.* 
  

  

  (/) 
  Genera 
  of 
  similar 
  but 
  not 
  identical 
  spelling, 
  as 
  Cepha 
  

   Billberg 
  and 
  Ce^^wsLatr.,are 
  both 
  vahd 
  under 
  the 
  code,t 
  

   unfortunate 
  as 
  the 
  fact 
  may 
  be 
  in 
  some 
  instances. 
  

  

  In 
  the 
  following 
  paper, 
  in 
  connection 
  with 
  the 
  genera 
  

   discussed 
  by 
  Morice 
  and 
  Durrant, 
  the 
  author 
  has 
  thought 
  it 
  

   worth 
  while 
  to 
  introduce 
  some 
  additional 
  genera 
  which 
  are 
  

   affected 
  directly 
  or 
  indirectly 
  by 
  these 
  decisions, 
  and 
  also 
  

   some 
  names 
  of 
  higher 
  groups, 
  in 
  order 
  not 
  to 
  leave 
  our 
  

   nomenclature, 
  in 
  a 
  measure, 
  upset 
  and 
  not 
  rebuilt. 
  

  

  It 
  is 
  to 
  be 
  understood 
  that 
  the 
  present 
  author 
  accepts 
  

   the 
  conclusions, 
  if 
  not 
  in 
  every 
  instance 
  the 
  methods, 
  

   published 
  by 
  Morice 
  and 
  Durrant 
  in 
  the 
  instances 
  of 
  genera 
  

   which 
  are 
  not 
  discussed 
  in 
  this 
  paper. 
  

  

  In 
  the 
  pages 
  which 
  follow 
  the 
  genera 
  included 
  in 
  the 
  

   Erlangen 
  fist 
  are 
  given 
  the 
  numbers 
  they 
  bear 
  in 
  that 
  hst. 
  

   Those 
  not 
  included 
  are 
  given 
  a 
  letter. 
  The 
  statement 
  of 
  

   the 
  type 
  in 
  each 
  case 
  apphes 
  to 
  the 
  generic 
  name 
  imme- 
  

   diately 
  following 
  the 
  figure 
  or 
  letter, 
  whether 
  accepted 
  as 
  

   a 
  valid 
  name 
  or 
  rejected 
  as 
  a 
  synonym 
  or 
  homonym. 
  In 
  

   order 
  to 
  make 
  the 
  matter 
  as 
  readily 
  comprehensible 
  as 
  

   possible, 
  all 
  names 
  used 
  in 
  a 
  rejected 
  sense 
  are 
  included 
  in 
  

   square 
  brackets, 
  while 
  names 
  used 
  in 
  their 
  accepted 
  sense 
  

   are 
  left 
  free. 
  In 
  a 
  few 
  instances 
  names 
  have 
  been 
  inclosed 
  

   in 
  parentheses 
  to 
  indicate 
  subgenera. 
  

  

  References 
  following 
  an 
  author's 
  name 
  are 
  by 
  year 
  and 
  

   page 
  to 
  the 
  List 
  at 
  the 
  close 
  of 
  this 
  article. 
  

  

  I. 
  1. 
  TENTHREDO 
  L. 
  nee. 
  auctt. 
  = 
  [Allantus 
  auctt.]. 
  

  

  Type 
  : 
  Tenthredo 
  scrophulariae 
  L. 
  Bv 
  designation 
  of 
  

   Latreille 
  (1810 
  : 
  435). 
  

  

  Lamarck 
  (1801 
  : 
  263) 
  probably 
  tannot 
  be 
  considered 
  as 
  

   having 
  fixed 
  a 
  type 
  for 
  Tenthredo.X 
  If 
  not, 
  the 
  first 
  vahd 
  

   designation 
  was 
  scrophulariae 
  by 
  Latreille 
  as 
  stated 
  by 
  

  

  * 
  See 
  discussion 
  under 
  the 
  case 
  of 
  the 
  genus 
  Philanthus, 
  seq. 
  

  

  t 
  In 
  the 
  International 
  Code 
  of 
  Zoological 
  Nomenclature, 
  Art. 
  36, 
  

   Recommendations, 
  is 
  found 
  the 
  following 
  : 
  " 
  It 
  is 
  well 
  to 
  avoid 
  the 
  

   introduction 
  of 
  new 
  generic 
  names 
  which 
  differ 
  from 
  generic 
  names 
  

   already 
  in 
  use 
  only 
  in 
  termination 
  or 
  in 
  a 
  slight 
  variation 
  in 
  spelling 
  

   which 
  might 
  lead 
  to 
  confusion. 
  But 
  when 
  once 
  introduced 
  such 
  

   names 
  are 
  not 
  to 
  be 
  rejected 
  on 
  this 
  account. 
  Examples 
  : 
  Picus, 
  

   Pica, 
  etc." 
  

  

  X 
  See 
  preceding 
  discussion 
  of 
  this 
  paper 
  on 
  p. 
  52. 
  

  

  