﻿66 
  Dr. 
  J. 
  Chester 
  Bradley 
  on 
  the 
  Synonymy 
  

  

  T. 
  jlavipes. 
  Schulz, 
  who 
  has 
  examined 
  the 
  types, 
  is^ 
  

   authority 
  for 
  their 
  identity.* 
  

  

  III. 
  27. 
  CRABRO 
  Geoffrey, 
  1762 
  {nee 
  Fabricius, 
  1775) 
  = 
  

   Cimbex 
  Oh 
  v.]. 
  

  

  Type 
  : 
  Crabro 
  humeralis 
  Fourcroy. 
  By 
  present 
  designa- 
  

   tion. 
  

  

  Geoffroy 
  described 
  Crabro 
  for 
  three 
  species, 
  not 
  given 
  

   uninominal 
  names, 
  but 
  fully 
  described 
  and 
  one 
  of 
  them 
  

   figured. 
  These 
  three 
  species 
  are 
  : 
  (1) 
  [Tenthredo] 
  lutea 
  L., 
  

   (2) 
  Crabro 
  humeralis 
  Fourcroy, 
  and 
  (3) 
  [Tenthredo] 
  connata 
  

   Schrank, 
  the 
  three 
  known 
  to 
  modern 
  authors 
  under 
  those 
  

   specific 
  names 
  as 
  species 
  of 
  Cimbex 
  Ohv. 
  

  

  GeofEroy's 
  usage 
  was 
  binary 
  but 
  not 
  binominal. 
  It 
  was 
  

   uninominal 
  for 
  generic 
  names, 
  and 
  these 
  must 
  be 
  accepted 
  

   under 
  the 
  code.t 
  The 
  type 
  must 
  be 
  chosen 
  from 
  the 
  three 
  

   included 
  species, 
  which, 
  although 
  uninominal 
  names 
  were 
  

   not 
  cited, 
  are 
  recognisable, 
  and 
  one 
  of 
  which 
  {lutea 
  L.) 
  

  

  * 
  The 
  Reverend 
  Mr. 
  Morice 
  has 
  written 
  me 
  as 
  follows, 
  and 
  I 
  am 
  

   quite 
  willing 
  to 
  accept 
  the 
  synonymy 
  as 
  he 
  suggests 
  it, 
  as 
  I 
  have 
  

   no 
  personal 
  knowledge 
  of 
  the 
  species 
  or 
  their 
  types 
  : 
  

  

  " 
  I 
  think, 
  however, 
  that 
  the 
  synonymy 
  as 
  you 
  give 
  it 
  is 
  still 
  not 
  

   quite 
  right. 
  If 
  Schulz 
  has 
  really 
  seen 
  the 
  types 
  of 
  Tiphia 
  ftavlpes 
  

   and 
  Tiphia 
  variegata, 
  I 
  am 
  puzzled, 
  and 
  think 
  he 
  must 
  have 
  made 
  

   a 
  mistake. 
  

  

  The 
  following, 
  so 
  far 
  as 
  I 
  can 
  make 
  out, 
  are 
  the 
  facts 
  — 
  

  

  " 
  Tiphia 
  variegata 
  Fabricius 
  " 
  Philanthits 
  flavipes 
  Fabricius 
  

  

  (Type 
  in 
  British 
  Museum, 
  seen 
  (teste 
  Latreille) 
  figured 
  by 
  Coque- 
  

  

  by 
  me) 
  bert 
  

  

  = 
  Crabro 
  flavipes 
  Fabricius. 
  = 
  Tiphia 
  flavipes 
  Fabricius. 
  

  

  = 
  Philanthits 
  flavipes 
  Panzer 
  = 
  Palarus 
  rufipes 
  Latreille, 
  

  

  (nee 
  Fabricius 
  teste 
  Latreille). 
  181L 
  

  

  = 
  Palarus 
  auriginosus 
  Eversm. 
  = 
  Palarus 
  humeralis 
  Dufour. 
  

  

  The 
  only 
  European 
  Palarus, 
  A 
  species 
  of 
  Algeria 
  and 
  

  

  commonly 
  known 
  as 
  ' 
  flavipes 
  ' 
  Morocco 
  commonly 
  known 
  as 
  

  

  hitherto." 
  ' 
  humeralis.' 
  ^' 
  

  

  (F. 
  D. 
  Morice). 
  

  

  According 
  to 
  this 
  synonymy 
  the 
  type 
  of 
  the 
  genus, 
  Tiphia 
  flavipes, 
  

   is 
  the 
  Algerian 
  sTpecies 
  humeralis 
  auctorum, 
  and 
  apparently 
  the 
  name 
  

   ' 
  flavipes 
  ' 
  is 
  valid. 
  

  

  t 
  The 
  case 
  is 
  exactly 
  parallel 
  with 
  that 
  of 
  Gronow's 
  Zooiihylacii, 
  

   etc., 
  1763. 
  Opinion 
  20 
  of 
  the 
  International 
  Commission 
  on 
  Zoo- 
  

   logical 
  Nomenclature 
  is 
  summarised 
  : 
  " 
  Gronow, 
  1763, 
  is 
  binary, 
  

   though 
  not 
  consistently 
  binominal. 
  Article 
  25 
  demands 
  that 
  an 
  

   author 
  be 
  binary, 
  and 
  Article 
  2 
  demands 
  that 
  generic 
  names 
  be 
  

   uninominal. 
  Under 
  these 
  articles 
  Gronow's 
  genera 
  are 
  to 
  be 
  

   accepted 
  as 
  complying 
  with 
  the 
  conditions 
  prescribed 
  by 
  the 
  Code 
  

   to 
  render 
  a 
  name 
  available 
  under 
  the 
  Code." 
  

  

  