﻿188 
  Mr. 
  H. 
  E. 
  Andrewes 
  on 
  the 
  

  

  9. 
  Morio 
  trogositoides. 
  \ 
  Bates 
  (p. 
  211) 
  gives 
  his 
  views 
  

   10. 
  Morio 
  cucujoides. 
  J 
  regarding 
  these 
  two 
  species, 
  which 
  

   he 
  evidently 
  considered 
  different, 
  and 
  which 
  he 
  did 
  not 
  

   identify 
  with 
  any 
  other 
  described 
  species. 
  He 
  was 
  also 
  

   uncertain 
  whether 
  the 
  example, 
  referred 
  doubtfully 
  by 
  

   Chaudoir 
  in 
  his 
  " 
  Essai 
  monographique 
  sur 
  les 
  Morionides 
  " 
  

   (Bull. 
  Mosc. 
  1880, 
  ii, 
  342) 
  to 
  Walker's 
  M. 
  cucujoides, 
  was 
  

   in 
  fact 
  that 
  species. 
  Earlier 
  in 
  his 
  paper 
  (p. 
  143) 
  Bates 
  

   identified 
  some 
  specimens 
  taken 
  by 
  Mr. 
  Lewis 
  as 
  M. 
  

   cordicolUs 
  Chaud. 
  (Mon. 
  343). 
  I 
  am 
  unable 
  to 
  express 
  any 
  

   opinion 
  regarding 
  Chaudoir's 
  M. 
  cucujoides, 
  but 
  I 
  consider 
  

   that 
  M. 
  trogositoides 
  Walk. 
  = 
  M. 
  cucujoides 
  Walk. 
  = 
  M. 
  

   cordicolUs 
  Chaud. 
  The 
  name 
  trogositoides 
  is 
  preoccupied, 
  

   and 
  cordicolUs 
  was 
  only 
  described 
  in 
  1880. 
  I 
  think 
  the 
  

   species 
  should 
  bear 
  the 
  name 
  M. 
  cucujoides 
  Walk. 
  

  

  It 
  is 
  widely 
  spread 
  through 
  India, 
  and 
  I 
  have 
  seen 
  

   examples 
  from 
  Siam 
  (Renong), 
  Andaman 
  Is., 
  Philippine 
  Is., 
  

   Java, 
  Gilolo, 
  and 
  Morty 
  I. 
  Mr. 
  Vitalis 
  de 
  Salvaza 
  has 
  

   lately 
  taken 
  many 
  specimens 
  in 
  Tonkin 
  and 
  Laos. 
  

  

  11. 
  Celaenephes 
  (? 
  Leistus) 
  linearis 
  = 
  C. 
  parallelus 
  Schm.- 
  

   Goeb. 
  (Faun. 
  Col. 
  Birni. 
  1846, 
  78, 
  t. 
  2, 
  f 
  . 
  5). 
  Bates 
  (p. 
  211) 
  

   considered 
  the 
  reference 
  of 
  this 
  species 
  to 
  the 
  genus 
  

   Leistus 
  as 
  " 
  one 
  of 
  Walker's 
  greatest 
  feats 
  of 
  random 
  

   identification," 
  

  

  Bates 
  tells 
  us 
  that 
  this 
  is 
  a 
  widely 
  distributed 
  Indian 
  

   and 
  Australasian 
  species, 
  but 
  I 
  have 
  not 
  myself 
  seen 
  

   examples 
  from 
  or 
  found 
  any 
  record 
  of 
  examples 
  taken 
  in 
  

   either 
  India 
  or 
  Australia. 
  I 
  have 
  seen 
  specimens 
  from 
  

   Ceylon, 
  Burma, 
  and 
  the 
  Malay 
  Peninsula; 
  also 
  many 
  

   examples 
  from 
  the 
  Malay 
  Archipelago, 
  including 
  the 
  

   Moluccas 
  and 
  New 
  Guinea. 
  There 
  are 
  records 
  also 
  from 
  

   Siam, 
  Indo 
  -China, 
  and 
  New 
  Caledonia. 
  

  

  12. 
  Dioryche 
  (Cardiaderus) 
  scita= 
  D. 
  (Selenophorus) 
  colom- 
  

   bensis 
  Nietn. 
  Bates 
  (p. 
  76) 
  gives 
  some 
  details 
  and 
  

   identifies 
  Walker's 
  species 
  with 
  Nietner's. 
  It 
  is 
  a 
  common 
  

   one 
  in 
  India 
  and 
  Ceylon, 
  but 
  does 
  not 
  seem 
  to 
  extend 
  

   further. 
  I 
  have, 
  however, 
  seen 
  examples 
  from 
  the 
  

   Maldive 
  Is. 
  

  

  13. 
  Anchomenus 
  illocatus. 
  Bates 
  adopted 
  Walker's 
  name 
  

   here 
  (p. 
  146) 
  and 
  redescribed 
  the 
  species. 
  Walker 
  described 
  

   it 
  again 
  on 
  the 
  next 
  page 
  under 
  the 
  name 
  of 
  Argutor 
  degener. 
  

   It 
  appears 
  to 
  be 
  confined 
  to 
  Ceylon. 
  

  

  14. 
  Abacetus 
  (Agonum) 
  placidulus. 
  Bates 
  does 
  not 
  

   mention 
  either 
  this 
  species 
  or 
  Selenophorus 
  infixus 
  described 
  

  

  