Munctic Relationships in the genus Heliconius. 135 



Section II. 



11. H. crispus, Stgr. 



12. H. hecuba, Hew. 



,, choarinus, Hew. 

 „ cassandra* Fold. 

 ,, longarenus,* Hew. 



13. #. xanthocles, Bates. 



14. H. hierax, Cram. 



15. //. hecalesia, Hew. 



,, octavia* Bates. 



16. H. godmani, ( ?) Stgr. 



17. H. metharmi, Erich. J (doubtfull sepa rate). 



18. //. aoede, Hubn. I v ^ r 



19. H. egeria, Cram. 



20. H. burneyi, Hubn. 



,, wallacei, Reak. 



21. H. duris, Linn. 



22. H. hewitsoni, Stgr. 



23. H. congener, Weyin. 



24. H. sapho, Dru. 



,, antiochus, Linn. 



,, leucadia, Bates. 



., sara, Fab. 



25. //. liimera. Hew. 



,, notabilis, Godm. 

 ,, cyrbia, Godt. 

 ,, favorinus, Hopf. 

 ,, petiveranus, Doubl. 



lu/darus, Hew\ 

 .. erato, Linn. 

 ,, amphitrite, Rill. 



26. //. hermathena, Hew. 

 ■J7. //. (harithonia. Linn. 



28. #. nattereri* Feld. | y * i q 

 .. fruhstorferi* Riff, j ' d anQ ¥ " 

 l m .». //. clysonimus, Latr. 



30. //. hortense, Guer. 



31. //. telesiphe, Doubl. 



One fact is especially striking. If the conclusions 

 arrived at are sound, Section I, containing some 35 reputed 

 species, is reduced to 10, whilst Section II, containing some 

 37 reputed species, is reduced to 21. Furthermore, when 

 considering the mimetic side of the question, it will appear 



