Canon A. M. Nonnau on British Amphipoda,^ 329 



1894. Paramphithoe uionocuspis, 

 G. O. Sars. 

 Apherusa borealis, G. O. Sars. 

 Haipiuia crenulata, G. O. 

 Sars. 

 *Metopa robusta, G. O. Sa7-s. 

 1896. Amphilochoides interme- 

 dius, sp. n. 

 Gammarus Duebeni, Lillje- 



horg. 

 Cheirocratus intermedins, 

 G. 0. Sars. 



1896.t? Msera Brooki, sp. n. 



1897. .'^Orchenienella miuiita, 



Kroyer. 

 J? Ampelisca Eschrichtii, 



Kroi/er. 

 ? Stegocephaloides auratus, 



G. O. Sars. 

 Monoculodes tuberculatus, 



G. O. Sars. 



1898. Dulichia monacantha, G. O, 



Sars. 



Fam. III. Pontoporeiidae. 

 [Genus 1. Pontoporeia, Kroyer. 



[Pontoporeia femorata, Kvojer. 



1842. Pontoporeia femorafa, Kroyer, Naturhist. Tidsskr., 1 Raekkes, 



vol. iv. p. 153 ; V'oyaf2:e en Scaud. &c. pi. xxiii. fig. 2. 

 1859. Pontoporeia furcit/era, Bruzelius, Scand. Amphip. Gaium. p. 49. 

 1876. Potitoporeia femorata and furciff era, Boeck, (138) pp. 197 & 201, 

 1891. PoJitoporeia femorata, G. 0. Sars, (142) p. 123, pi. xli. fig. 1. 



Off Hare Island, Waigat Sound, Greenland, in 175 fathoms, 

 'Valorous,' 1875. 



THstrib. Klosterelv Fiord, East P^inmark, 8-5 fathoms, 

 1890 {A. M. N.) ; Tromso {Schneider) ; Spitsbergen (Loven) ; 

 Gulf of St. Lawrence {S. I. Smith)) : 3Ius. i\W. Through- 

 out the Arctic Ocean and southward as far as the Baltic. 

 Kiel {Blanc); West Sweden {Lilljeboi-g).'] 



Genus 2. Bathypokeia, Lindstrom. 



I cannot regard some of the following forms as entitled to 

 .specific — indeed, they seem hardly worthy of varietal — 



• Moray Firth (Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. ser. 6, vol. xiii. p. 148). 



+ Isle of Mull. 



I The four following species are from the Clyde district. Of these 

 Ampelisca Eschrichtii, Stt'yocephaloides auratus, and Orchemenella tninuta, 

 Kroyer, have not been seen by Mr. Scott, but are given by him from a 

 MS.' catalogue of Crustacea dredged by Sir J. Murray's steamer, the 

 ' Medusa.' In noticing Orchemetielta mimtta in the paper preceding this 

 (p. 204) I committed two errors, for the first of which 1 cannot account; 

 the date 1870 is substituted for " 16-17 fathoms," and in stating " we do 

 not know the authority who identified the species," I had overlooked a 

 note of Mr. Scott's at p. 109 (Fifteenth Ann. Eep. Fishery Board of 

 Scotland), which .«tates that the "Crustacea" were identified by R. I. 

 Pocock, Esq. I have now consulted Mr. Pocock, and he tells nie that 

 he wishes that the occurrence of these species in Loch Fyue should be 

 considered doubtful unless subser^uently confirmed. 



