Lord Walsingham on Asiatic Tortricidse. 375 



A single specimen of brood 1. t'roui Uiwake. 



Prof. Fernald records brood II. from New York and Penn- 

 sylvania, and suggests that trisignana, E,bsn., may be identical 

 with brood I. In Staudinger and Wocke's 'Catalog' the 

 name parisiana, Gii., is adopted for brood II., while Prof. 

 Fernald designates this brood scabrana^ Crt. Curtis referred 

 Fabricius's PyraJis scahrana to the genus Leptogramma, and 

 Stephens referred the same name to the genus Aclris. 

 Neither of tiiese authors published a new species as scabrana, 

 and as their names are now regarded as " erroneous in adop- 

 tion," they cannot be accepted as valid, 



Leptogramma parisiana, Gn. (1845), must sink as a syno- 

 nym of Glyphiptera ulmana, Dp. (18oJ:), the validity of 

 which is in no way affected by the earlier Tortrix {Eademis) 

 ulmana, Hb. Should it be desirable to refer to the second 

 brood under a varietal name it should be called Boscana, F. 

 [II. uhnana, Dp.] . 



(663). Oxygrapha nivisellana, Wlsm. 



Terns nivisellana, Wlsm. 111. Lp. Ilet. B. M. IV. 2, PI. LXI.3 (1879) ' ; 

 Fern. Tr. Am. Ent. Soc. X. 8. No. 16 (1882) -. 



JIab. United States— Maine", New York', California', 

 Oregon', Y.\ VIII.' Japan — Kiusw (two specimens 

 received from Mr. J. H. Leech). 



664. Oxygrapha literana, L. 

 Teras literana, Stgr. & Wk. Cat. Lp. Eur. 23-3-4. No. (364 (1871). 



7. literana, h.+squamana, F. 

 Hah. Europe. Asiatlc Turkey— Z/"^Es—Shar Devesy 

 [Native Coll.). 



670 (1). Oxygrapha albiscapalana, Clir. 

 Teras alhiscapulana, Chr. Bull. Soc. Imp. Nat.Mosc. LVI.63-4. No. 98 



(1881)^: se;;. 151-2 (1882)'. 

 Hab. Amur— Wladiwostok ' , V.' COREA— Gensan [Leech, 



1886). , J , . r 



A single specimen, which appears to be a dark variety ot 

 this species, distinguished from others of the genus by the 

 distinct division of the teguUe into a dark anterior and a pale 

 posterior half ; in the specimen before me the paler portion 

 cannot be called clear white, as in the original description, but 

 I am not acquainted with any other species possessing the 

 same peculiarity, and in a genus so variable I cannot venture 

 to describe it as distinct without access to the type or some 

 further reliable evidence. 



