3. Catochri/sops pandava, Horsf. ?. From N. Ceylon. It 

 differs considerably from the normal larger form with which 

 Mr. Ormiston has taken it at Trincomali in Dec, 1918, and 

 he considers it probably a distinct species. The series in the 

 B.M. is too poor to attempt to decide this point. 



4. Syntarucus {Tarucus) telicamis f. plinms, Fab. Aberration 

 with coalescent spots. 



5. Nacaduha noreia, Feld. $. This insect described by 

 Felder in 1864: has never since been correctly determined. 

 The name has usually been applied to the tailless form of 

 N. ardates. The species here exhibited, however, seems 

 withoiit doubt to be the true N. noreia, Feld., with the descrip- 

 tion of which it very well agrees. 



6. Nacaduha da}i,a, de Nice. cJ. Aberration with the mark- 

 ings of underside almost entirely absent. 



7. Nacaduha alrata, Horsf. Aberration with fore-wings 

 with dissimilar markings. Right wing has additional spot 

 below cell. 



8. Nacaduha nora, Feld. " Aberration in which the basal 

 strigae are not produced below the cell. It grades perfectly 

 into normal, through other specimens in my collection " 

 (Ormiston). 



9. Chilades laius, Cram. Aberration taken during extreme 

 dry season. 



10. Arhopala, sp. cJ $ of an apparently undescribed species. 



11. Apknaeus nuhilus, Moore. This would appear to be a 

 good species. It is quite constantly different from the 

 Apknaeus known in Ceylon as A. iclis. Hew. 



12. A. iclis, Hew. From Ceylon for comparison. 



13. A. ictis, Hew. ? ?. Aberrations in which the siibapical 

 orange spot is absent or nearly so. 



14. Apknaeus, sp. These as far as can be judged are the 

 Race 2 of Ormiston (" Notes on Ceylon Butterflies," Spolia 

 Zeylanica, 1918). They are also considered by Mr. Fairlie, 

 who first met with the form, to be a distinct species. They 

 would appear to differ fairly constantly, but the two poor 

 specimens here shown are the only ones so far seen. They 

 have been brought up so as to make the exhibit of this 

 rather puzzling group as complete as possible. 



PROC. ENT. SOC. LOND., I, II, 1920. B 



