98 Mr. K. I. Pocock on the Species of 



Plate V. 



Fig. 1, Lepeophtheirus rotnndiventris, $ , sp. n., seen from the back. 



1 a. From beneath, much enlarged. 1 b. Terminal portion, 



with caudal plates. 1 c. Male. 

 Fig. 2. Lepeophtheirus longipalpus, $ , sp. n., seen from back. 



2 a. Organs round the mouth. 2 b, c. Third and fourth perseo- 



pods. 2d. Claw of fourth pergeopod, much magnified. 



2 e. Rudimentary fifth. 2f. Caudal plate. 

 Fig. 3. Anuretes perplexus, 2, sp. n., from the back. 



3 a. Cephalothorax from beneath. 3 b, c. Third and fourth 



peraeopods, enlarged. Sd. Terminal portion of genital 

 segment, showing fifth peraeopods and caudal plates, 



3 e. The same in varied form. 



Plate VI. 



Fig. 1. Pseudoclavella ovalis. gen. et sp. n. 



1 a. Seen from the back, much enlarged. 1 b. Side view of 



head and thorax. 1 c. Underside of cephalothorax. 



1 d, e,f, g. First to fourth limb9. 



Fig. 2. Brachiella multifimbriata, 5, sp. n., seen from the back, with 

 processes spread out. 



2 a. Same, seen from the side. 2 b. Fixing-organ of second 



maxilliped. 2 c. Under surface of head, much enlarged, 

 showing organs. 2 d. Palp, more highly magnified. 



2 e. Male, highly magnified. 2f. A. 1 and A. 2 of the 

 same. 2 g. Strong first maxilliped of the same. 



Fig. 3. Lcmanthropus atro.r, $ , Heller, seen from the back. 



3 a. Seen from the side. 3 b. Anterior and posterior antennas 



of the same, much enlarged. 3 c. Male, enlarged, seen 

 from below. 3 d. Mandible and maxillary palp. 

 3e,/. First and second thoracic limbs. 



N .B. — The line to the right of the figure gives the natural 

 length of the animal. 



X1Y. — The Species of Scorpions of the Genus Broteas. 

 By 11. I. TOCOCK. 



On page 173 of his recent 'Revision of Scorpions' Professor 

 Kraepelin reduces the five species of Broteas that had been 

 established to one, which he calls maurus, Herbst. As I 

 have already pointed out, this name is, in my opinion, invalid ; 

 nevertheless the question of the name is of little importance 

 as compared with the identity of the scorpions to which 

 Prof. Kraepelin applies it. Being by no means satisfied as 

 to the correctness of this author's synonymy, I wrote to 

 M. Simon to beg for his types of B. yranirfatus and B. para- 

 ensis and for an example of the species he considered to be 



