of the Genus Catophaga. 39.H 



2. Hyposcritia shiva. 



Hyposcritia shiva, Swinhoe, P. Z. S. 1385, p. 138, pi. ix. figs. 1, 2. 



Poona, Manipur, and Burma. J 1 , type, B. M. 

 The female much resembles that sex of H. leptis on the 

 upper surface, but the male looks like II. indra starved. 



3. Hyposcritia narendra. 



Hyposcritia narendra, Moore, Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. ser. 4, vol. xx. 

 p. 48 (1877). 



Ceylon. B. M. 



Var. (?). Nilgiris. B. M. 



I have only seen dry forms of this species ; the Nilgiri 

 type may possibly be a large form of //. shiva, which it 

 resembles almost as closely as it does the Ceylonese species. 



4. Hyposcritia leptis. 



Pieris leptis, Felder, Reise. der Nov., Lep. ii. p. 163 (I860). 



Tachyris Lucasii, Wallace, Trans. Ent. Soc. ser. 3, vol. iv. p. 381 (1867). 



Java. Wet-season phase, B. M. Dry-season phase, coll. 

 Hewitson. 



5. Hyposcritia plana. 



Appias plana, Butler, Trans. Linn. Soc. 2, Zool. i. p. 551 (1879). 



Borneo, Sumatra, Malacca, Batchian. Type, B. M. 

 I have only seen the wet-season phase of this species, and 

 it is possible that no dry phase may exist. 



C. Hyposcritia pandione. 



Hiposcritia pandione, Hiibner, Zutr. exot. Schmett. figs. 651, 652 



(1832). 

 Pieris ida (?), Lucas, Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1852, p. 335. 



Java. B. M. 



1 have only seen a dry phase of this species; but it is 

 quite likely that //. ida may be the wet-season form. 



7. Hyposcritia Whiteheads . 



Appias Whitehead*, Grose-Smith, Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. ser. 5, 

 vol. xx. p. 434 (1887) ; Rhop. Exot. L, Pier. ii. figs. 4, 5 (1889). 



Kina Balu. B. M. 



