408 SUBJECT-INDEX OF CASE. 



Page. 



Increase of sealing fleet 183 



Indian hunters: 



Description of spear, canoe, and manner of hunting by 189 



Lose very few seals struck - 190 



Opinions of, as to need of protection 247 



Indians : 



Catch of, along coast 187 



Employed as hunters prior to 1885 187 



Makah on cause of decrease 180 



Opinions of, as to cause of decrease 179 



Seal hunting along the coast by 187 



industry. (ASee Fur-seals; Sealskin industry.) 



Inhabitants of Pribilof Islands. (Sec also Natives) 20 



Introduction 1 



Investigation : 



Congressional, of 1876 137 



Congressional, of 1888 137 



Investigation of management. (See Investigation, Congressional.) 



Investment, Canadian : 



In pelagic sealing in 1890, exaggerated 276 



In pelagic sealing in 1891 277 



In sealskin industry in 1890 275 



Insignificant 278, 280, 298 



Questionable 281 



Investments 275 



Canadian and United States, compared 279 



French and Canadian, compared 281 



In 1890, British and Canadian, contraste;! 277 



In 1891, Canadian and British, contrasted 272 



Irish oyster fisheries 232 



Islands in Bering Sea 14, 20 



Italian legislation 235 



Jan May en hair-seal fishery 227 



Joint Commission 7 



Keport of 7, 8 



Jurisdiction: 



Claimed by ukase of 1821 over North Pacific Ocean 38 



Russia relinquished, claimed over Pacific Ocean 56 



Extraterritorial 231 



British hovering acts 237 



By France, protecting Algerian coral fisheries 235 



By Italy, protecting coral fisheries 235 



By Mexico, protecting pearl fisheries 236 



By Norway, i)rotecting whales 236 



By Panama, protecting pearl fisheries 236 



In relation to fisheries 230 



