Index 



287 



Hells Canyon, cont. 

 summary and conclusions: 



alternate development plans, 268; 

 benefits, sources of data for, 168- 



69; 

 compensation of private developer, 



163-66, 269-70; 

 and co-ordinated management, 165, 



270; 

 costs, annual, sources of data for, 



167-68; 

 deferred development as alterna- 

 tive, 161; 

 efficiency, sacrifice of for higher 



criteria, 163; 

 efficient private development, al- 

 ternative ways to achieve, 163- 

 66; 

 estimated taxes, 168; 

 federal development, as alterna- 

 tive plan, 160; 

 indivisibility, in two-dam plan, 



160, 163; 

 interdependence among facilities, 



163-66; 

 interest rates as used in efficiency 



analysis, 159-60, 167; 

 investment data, sources for, 166- 



67; 

 local government development as 



alternative plan, 160-61; 

 most efficient approach to develop- 

 ment, 159-60, 161, 163; 

 private development as alternative 



plan, 161-63; 

 project services, under two- and 

 three-dam plans, compared, 159, 

 160; 

 public subsidy, as alternative to 

 purely private development, 163- 

 64, 269 

 Hill, Lister, 194 

 Hogg, 156n, 157n, 158n 

 Hoje. H. C, 59n 

 Holly Sugar Corporation, 59n 

 household credit corporations, 82 

 households, distribution of gains to, 

 imder alternate forms of river de- 

 velopment, 241, 243, 252, 255, 256. 

 256n. 258 

 Howell Mill Shoals project, 178, 182n, 

 185-86, 187; as not economically jus- 

 tified, 191, 192n; private develop- 



Howell Mill Shoals project, cont. 

 ment of, alternate plans for, 188-89, 

 Table, 190; public development of, 

 alternate plans for, 187-88, 189-92, 

 Tables, 188, 191 

 Hoyt, W. C, 54n, 55n, 57n 

 Huffman, R. E., 59n 

 Hughes, Rufus B., vi 

 Hungry Horse project: prime power 

 generation of, 64, 64n; technological 

 external economies of. Table, 62, 

 Fig., 63 

 Hutchison, T. W., 20/1 

 hydroelectric power {see also Alabama- 



Coosa river system; Hells Canyon; 



Willamette River project): 

 at-site power generation, 64, 66, 140, 



150, 153, 156, Tables, 146, 150; 

 at-site value, method of deriving, 



154-55. 155n; 

 capacity of Alabama Power Com- 

 pany, 175-76, 268; 

 compensation of private developer 



of storage, proposal for, 270 {see 



also under storage); 

 critical period, 66, 145, 148n, 150n, 



157, 158, 168; 

 downstream power generation. 63- 



66, 137, 140, 144n, 145, 150. 150n. 



157. 157n. 169; 

 dump power, 62, 67; 

 federally controlled energy, distribu- 

 tion to final- and derived-demand 



uses, 238; 

 indivisibility and interdependence 



in, 61-68. 163-66, 171, 180-81; 

 for industrial uses, 238-39; 

 potential, 61, 6l7z, 153n. 160, 170-71, 

 196, 239: 



efficient utilization of, 183; 



and electrical system of the devel- 

 oper, 180-81, 267-68; 



as a public resource, 153n. 164, 

 164n. 165, 269, 270; 

 power markets, 61-62, 162; 

 and "preference clause," 234, 235; 

 preference customers' requirements, 



239; 

 primary power. 65-67. 67n, 158. 173; 

 prime power. 64, 64rj, 65, 66, 67n- 



68n, 1417Z, 145-46, 147n, 148n, 



150n. 152", 154. 157. 163. 168-69, 



269-70; 



