781 



Number 10. 



On Viola sylvatica and canina. By W. H. Purchas, Esq. [A se- 

 ries of figures of the capsules, with judicious remarks on the two spe- 

 cies and their nomenclature.] 



On Fumaria parviflora, Lam., and Vaillantii, Lois. By Arthur 

 Henfrey, F.L.S. [Mr. Henfrey considers that the plants of Kent and 

 Essex, found by himself and by Mr. G. S. Gibson, belong to F. par- 

 viflora, and states that he has not seen British specimens of F. Vail- 

 lantii.] 



Observations on certain French and German Plants. By Dr. F. 

 Schultz. [Translation from the ' Flora,' of April 12, 1849.] 



Special Morphology. By Prof. Schleiden. [Extract] 



On a remarkable Monstrosity of the Vinca. By Professor Edward 

 Forbes. 



Literature. Proceedings of Societies. Miscellanea. 



Number 11. 



Observations on the genus Ulex, with the Description of a New 

 Species common to Brittany and the South-east of England. By J. 

 E. Planchon, Dr. es Sciences. [Translation from the * Annales des 

 Sciences Naturelles.' The alleged new species was known several 

 years ago among English botanists, and mentioned in Babington's 

 Manual as a variety, " major," of Ulex nanus. Dr. Planchon gives 

 to it the name of U. Gallii.] 



On the Dorsetshire Ulices. By Prof. E. Forbes. [Mr. Forbes 

 says of Dr. Planchon's dissevered species, nanus and Gallii, that " the 

 distinctive characters he assigns to them will not do in the field, how- 

 ever well they may contrast on paper."] 



Note on Dr. Planchon's paper on Ulex Gallii. By Charles C. Ba- 

 bington, M.A. 



On the British forms of Daucus Carota. By Prof. Edward Forbes, 

 F.R.S. [Prof. Forbes thinks " that we had better give up attempting 

 to divide our British carrots into more species than one."] 



On the Rumex palustris of Smith. By C. C. Babington, M.A. 



Literature. Proceedings of Societies. Miscellanea. [The ' Mis- 

 cellanea ' include " Records of Localities," and other minor points of 

 information. The records doubtless are understood by the editor to 

 rest upon the personal testimony of the individual contributor. Some 

 few of them are errors of name, or unnecessary repetitions of facts old 

 in print; and this class will soon increase, if not guarded against. It 



