Gee cea ct 
q 
. 
a 4 99 990 Sea gS & 
33. U. 
carinifera, Lam. 
§' 
radiata, Lam. 
brevialis, Lam. 
rhombula, Lam. 
eorgina, lam. 
clava, Lam. 
recta, Lam. 
naviformis, Lam. 
glabrata, Lam. 
nasuta, Lam. 
, Lam. 
Miscellanies. 
t 
{ 
F 
ts 
i 
175 
Lamarck gives the Mya radiata of 
Gmelin and U. ochraceus of Say as 
radiata, G. differs from bot 
Resembles the circulus of Ohio, but 
is larger, less round and radiated. 
It is, no doubt, a distinct species. 
Varieties of the complanatus. 
ae pe identified with any of 
our s 
ae same as Barnes’s pralongus. 
The recta — described first, 
should be retai 
cylindricus of Sey, and _previ- 
ay described: the sat ae 
therefore, cannot stan 
A Moor: of the cariosus most prob- 
Either ae = ia Lam. or the 
The caer i ‘Say. 
The circulus of Lea. 
littoralis, gacrsbed by Draparnaud, who says it resembles” 
the margaritifera, but is much smaller 
semirugata, Lam. 
nana, Lam. 
alata, Lam. 
delodonta, Lam. 
sulcidens, Lam. 
rostrata, Lam. 
pictorum, Lam. 
batava, Lam. 
E 
Cannot be identified. 
Habitat is Franche Comté. 
Alatus of Say and a 
alata, of Lea. 
Description too short. 
A variety of complanatus. 
The specimens sent Mr. Lea from 
Europe, are only varieties of the 
orum 
Mya pictorum, Lin. 
The enmgenor sent Mr. Lea from 
Europe, appear to be only varie- 
ties of ‘he pictorum. 
