1 1 6 COSMOS. 



We can ascertain by measurement the enormous, wonder- 

 ful, and wholly planetary velocity of shooting stars, fire-balls, 

 and meteoric stones, and we can gain a knowledge of what is 

 the general and uniform character of the phenomenon, but 

 not of the genetically cosmical process arid the results of the 

 metamorphoses. If meteoric stories while revolving in space 

 are already consolidated into dense masses,* less dense, how 



nius even ventured to deride the geoguostic myth of the blocks and 

 stones. The Lygian field of stones was, however, very naturally and 

 well described by the ancients. The district is now known as La Crau. 

 (See Guorin, Mesures Barom6triqu.es dans les Alpei, et Meteorologie 

 (V Avignon, 1829, chap, xii., p. 115.) 



* The specific weight of aerolites varies from 1-9 (Alais^ to 4-3 

 (Tabor). Their general density may be set down as 3, water being 1. 

 As to what has been said in the text of the actual diameters of fire-balls, 

 we must remark, that the numbers have been taken from the few 

 measurements that can be relied upon as correct. These give for the 

 fire-ball of Weston, Connecticut (14th December, 1807), only 500; for 

 that observed by Le Roi (10th July, 1771) about 1000, and for that 

 estimated by Sir Charles Blagden (18th January, 1783) 2600 feet in 

 diameter. Brandes (Unterkaltungen, bd. i., s. 42) ascribes a diameter 

 varying from 80 to 120 feet to shooting stars, and a luminous train ex- 

 tending from 12 to 16 miles. There are, however, ample optical caus- 

 es for supposing that the apparent diameter of fire-balls and shooting 

 stars has been very much overrated. The volume of the largest fire- 

 ball yet observed can not be compared with that rf Ceres, estimating 

 this planet to have a diameter of only 7J English miles. (See the 

 generally so exact and -admirable treatise, t)n the Connection of the 

 Physical Sciences, 1835, p. 411.) With the view of elucidating what 

 has been stated in the text regarding the large aerolite that fell into 

 the bed of the River Narni, but has not again been found, I will give 

 the passage made known by Pertz, from the Chronicon Benedicti, Mon- 

 achi Sancti Andreas in Monte Soracte, a MS. belonging to the tenth 

 century, and preserved in theChigi Library at Rome. The barbarous 

 Latin of that age has been left unchanged. "Anno 921, temporibut 

 domini Johannis Decimi pape, in anno pontijicatus illiiis 7 visa sunt sig- 

 na. Nam juxta urbem Romam lapides plurimi de ccelo cadere visi stint. 

 In civitate qua: vocatur Narnia tarn diri ac tetri, ut nihil aliud credal.nr, 

 qnam de infernalibus locit deducti essent. Nam ita ex Hits lapidibus 

 unus omnium maximus et, ut d-\cidens in flumen Narnvs, ad mensuram 

 Indus cubiti super aquas flumini t usque kodie videretur. Nam et igniter 

 faculce de caslo plurimce omnibus in hac civitate Romani populi visa sunt, 

 ita ut pene terra contingeret. Alice cadentes," &c. (Pertz, Monum. 

 Germ. Hitt. Scriptores, t. iii., p. 715.) On the aerolites of JEgos Pota- 

 in os, which fell, according to the Parian Chronicle, in the 78 1 Olym- 

 piad, see BSckh, Corp. Jnscr. Grace., t. ii., p. 302, 320, 340; also Aris- 

 tot., Meteor., i., 7 (Ideler's Comm., t. i., p. 404-407) ; Stob., Eel. Phys., 

 i., 25, p. 508 (Heeren); Plut., Lyt., c. 12; Diog. Laert., ii., 10; and 

 see, also, subsequent notes in this work. According to a Mongolian 

 tradition, a black fragment of a rock, forty feet in height, fell from 

 heaven on a plain near the sou :ce of the Great Yellow River in West 

 em China. (Abel Remusa*, in Lam6therie, Jour, de Phys., 1819, Ma 

 p. 264.) 



