50 



out over 100 of those, I believe, for his own information. And I am 

 sure will share that. 



For all of you, I am interested in the types of subsidized competi- 

 tion you face in trying to reach into new and existing markets. 



Do any of you have any specific examples of what you consider 

 unfair competition for global markets for your product? 



And I have heard you allude to and mention them, but maybe 

 we could be brief and give me some examples. 



Mr. Johnson, I know you have done that. 



Mr. Johnson. Mr. Chairman, yes, we know, for instance, that 

 our cost of production of pork in the United States is approximately 

 10 cents to 12 cents less than that of Denmark. Yet, when we mar- 

 ket products in Japan, their product will be priced between 30 and 

 40 percent under ours. So in this instance, we know that is made 

 up by the Government's adding an export subsidy, the Danish Gov- 

 ernment. So that would be one case. We also know that the Cana- 

 dian Government, for instance, has a tripartite program, that sub- 

 sidizes the actual production of pork in Canada. So we are fighting 

 against that, and have done some work with that. 



Mr. CONDIT. Mr. Krajeck. 



Mr. Krajeck. A clear example for us would be the Korean mar- 

 ket for feed grains, which at one point was between 80 and 85 per- 

 cent held by the United States, is now this year running, I think, 

 at 8 percent. The primary loss in that market has been to Chinese 

 com, which has been subsidized, but the bulk of the market has 

 been lost to EC subsidized wheat. 



We complete a report on an annual basis of markets that we lose 

 to unfair competition, and I would like to forward a copy of that 

 report to the committee so that you can see in a broad range of is- 

 sues where we are facing unfair competition. 



Mr. CONDIT. Mr. Krajeck, we will make that part of the record, 

 if there is no objection to that. 



Mr. Krajeck. Thank you. 



[The information follows:] 



