181 



woricing relationship it enjoys with the PUinOfT B <t W and other clienu Miupin v Stansbury. 



Ky.App.. 575 S.W.2d 695 (1978). 



Wherefore, for ill the naions suted above in the body of thii Order, the 



I>cfeT>danfi Motion for an in camera review and to dissolve the Tcmpofiiy Restraining Older 



ire DENDED. The Plaintiff « Motion for a Temporary Injunctioo is CRAffTED, and 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. Defendant, Mcndl Williams, and his agents, attorneys, mccessoa and 



assigns, and all persons participating with, or acting on his behilf or within his control oc 



direction or in concert wift him, and aO persons who arc iafonned of tha Resotining Orda are 



hereby restrained and enjoined from 



(a) Disclosing to anyone other than the Plaintifft of Intervening Plaintiff 



any naterial or infonsatiofl in the possession or control of the said Def cnri a n t, 



Meireil WilHams, inchding, without limitation and whether in the category of 



"privileged' or "confidenjial' or otherwise: (i) all docianenta, c oii ni uta discs and 



drives and other stongc/retheval systems and other tangible and dectrooic 



materials and things belonging to Plaintiff or any of their clients, including, 



without limitaaon, Intervening Plaintiff, B & W; (it) all informatioQ contained 



dierein and thereoa, all infcxmadon learned therefrom, and aQ informatiaci leaned 



in coanectioa with the employment of MeneQ Williams by Plaintiffs or 



Intervening PlainfifT; and (iti) all documents, maaoscripts, namtives, 



reprodoctioos, copies, storage and retrieval systems and charts, graphs or tables 



