/. 



362 



Crogp t«(««rch I D«y«lop«Mac C«ncrt, 

 lrleiih-A«tricu Tobacco Co. Le4., 

 \- SOVTHAMTTOM. 



JRC/AXC/CAI./I4I .- ^th ^r*«S l»?«- 



V; ■ 



OF HUHAK SHOtCtWC tEHAVIOVI 



-v- VSIMG urn A-SALYStS 

 (RepOi-c^. 10.1608 Kctcriccid) 



SUVMARY AM) COSCLUSIONS '/y 



.;BuCC «a«lytis of filter tips Kit b««Q.uie4 u • ooa-iavttiv* cechAi^uc 



to asscn. ch« tnokint behaviour of human tuQ;eo|^i Vy t(Ciaacia( cha 



delivary oP^icociae which cha/ obcaia fro« cit<T4<cat. Tbetc dclivarici 



have beaa ce*PM>d with chota datcrmioed fro* kachia«'*aoklas. It has 



been potiiola, {or^^ea paoalt of tubjacctt Co coaipara ^^ toolttat of 



cigaretctt of dtf fartaf^aicht and da*ita* and to coapara saokinf t* 



differaac external ••▼Icoaj&aACt. 



Theia f tudiaa, whi*^ Wva 9jp|o coaplatad by (roups of axpariMacars 



outside I.A.T, have shown ckat subj^^cs uaj aodify their saoking behaviour 



under a variacx of clrcuaatancM. Oaa^^soup of subjects was fouod Co 



saoke low aleotiae delivary cltarettas witV-f reater iacensity than aedita 



■<< 

 oicetiac dvlivsry ci|«recces during a mabar orpdiffcrent perCoraanee 



casks. In two studies subjects saoked "shorceaed" -citarettes but ia 



only one of these was there a tendency (or this aaalput^cion to affect 



nicocina delivery obtained by the subjects. There was soaa'^^dicaeioa * 



Chac saokin( behaviour aay differ between laboratory and work/no«a i( 



... « •- 



conditions. — 



lO 



* 



