433 



^^ . - 26 - 



' . . . H U oot possible grossly or microscopically, or in any 

 other vay known to me, to distinguish between the lung of a 

 smoker o^AIK>n smoker. Blackening of lungs is from carbon 

 particles, al^j^to^olung tobacco does not introduce carbon - 

 particle S/Oto^M lung. " 



The whole que^i^n wa tumined up well by Dr. Irving Zeidman. 

 "O 



Professor of Pathology at the"JJaiver8lty of Pennsylvania, when he was 



/■_. 



asked in Congress whether it was pSssible to tell which of two lungs was 



the lung of a smoker. He said: ~ 



---. "I would estimate that of a thousMd pathologists in this country 

 .^ J98 would say. 'I could not tell, ' afii* the other two would say, 'I 

 'cou)d tell, ' and those two who could teC^either bad some divine 

 int<i»jion or were not telling the truth. '*^0 

 -. '^ 



It wouMi-thus appear that at best this claim f^yot actentifically 

 supportable ahd, tt vt^ytet. that it is another deliberate att»«ia: to trighten 



'if 



\, 



-^/ 



^->. 



"V 



^>, 



V,, 







5, 9 



