P»ge 4 



The Illinois Agricultural Association Record 



April 5, 1924 



\€< 



Since It Will Relieve Him—' 



Rainey.Asks 25 Questions 

 I I On Farm Relief Measure 



( Continued from Juee 3> 



bill for political purposes only, in 

 the hope that farmers will be 

 fooled into believins they are go- 

 ing to set some advantage out of 

 the passage of this legislation? 

 Hhs Farmer nenefllteil? 



11. Inasmuch as Congress so 

 far has passed every piece of al- 

 leged remedial legislation Farm 

 Organizations have asked, is it 

 not time to inquire into what ben- 

 efits fsrmers have derived from 

 the legislation, presuhiably passed 

 at the demand of the Farm Bloc 

 in Conjiress and Agricultural As- 

 aoeiatiens? 



( a I Has the farmer benefitted 

 by the protective tariff Congress 

 has given bini on practically 

 everything he produces? 



(b) I notice that hogs are now 

 going UT> on the Chicago markets. 

 Is this due to the protective tariff, 

 inasmuch as there is no protec- 

 tive tariff on hogs? 



(ci Would it not be advisable 

 for the Illinois Agricultural Asso- 

 ciation to advocate a reduction in 

 the tariff on all articles the farmer 

 bujs? j 



(d) Is it the position of the 

 Illinois Agricultural .Vssociation 

 that the tariff does not add to the 

 price the farmer pays for things 

 he is compelled to purchase? 

 Why Xot Have Kye? 



12. Can you explain why the 

 bill does not include in its provi- 

 sions, r>e. oats, and barley? 



(a) Is it not true that in certain 

 countries to which we export 

 wheat, rye is used interchange- 

 ably with wheat, and the price of 

 wheat is affected very directly by 

 the priee of rye? 



(b) If the above is true, and I 

 think you will answer that it is, 

 then why not include rye in the 

 provisions of this bill? 



Raise Commodity Index 



13. If we raise artificially the 

 price of all farm products to cor- 

 respond with the level of prices 

 of all commodities, will we not be 

 compelled also to raise the all 

 commodity index, and if we do 

 that, how in point of fact can we 

 ever get these prices Into adjust- 

 ment with the basic ratio price? 



AVks About Ratio Price 



14. Where is the ratio price to 

 be applied? Is it to be based on 

 New York. Chicago, or some other 

 point? 



( a I Will there be different ra- 

 tio prices for all these terminals? 



(b) How will the ratio price be 

 reflected] back to the farmer 

 through the local elevator? 



(el There are a number of 

 classes of wheat, and a number of 

 grades within each class, and how 

 can the intrinsic value dt, each 

 class and grade to the mnler be 

 controlled by ratio prices estab- 

 lished by the Government? 

 What Will Miller Do? 



(d) If the miller buys the grade 

 which represents the best value 

 for the ratio price, what will be 

 the effect on the marltet of the 

 less valuable grades? 



(e) Will not ^he miller buy only 

 on a limited basis; will he not 

 buy •wheat only to fill orders he is 

 able to get for flour at a price 

 whi(^ will protect him? 



(f) Is it not true that the miller 

 Kill be unable to make flour tor 

 the export trade at all unless he 

 is usured against lossi 



(g( Is there any authority in 

 the bill by which the miller can he 

 indemnified against possible loss? 



(hi If he is not indemnified 

 against loss, will he not desert the 

 foreign field for his products? 



(i) What effect would this have 

 upon the farmer if the miller re- 

 fuses to take chances and engage 

 in the business of exporting flour? 

 Asks All About Wheat 



15. Is it not true that the con- 

 sumption of wheat in the United 

 States fluctuates from one year to 

 another more than one bushel per 

 capita — 110,000,000 bushels a 

 year? 



' (a) Is it not true that wheat is 

 harvested somewhere in the world 

 every month in the year? 



(b) If to eich of the above 

 questions your answer is Yes, 

 then, how is it possible to estimate 

 months in advance the questions 

 of production, exportable surplus, 

 or foreign prices? 



(c) If it is impossible to so es- 

 timate in the above matters, how 

 can a ratio price be established? 



What Will Re Kx|.ense? 



16. What will be the expense 

 of the operation of the agencies 

 of the Government contemplated 

 in this bill? 



(a) How many employees will 

 there be? 



(b) Will there not be many 

 thousand employees? 



^lore .About "Scrip**. 



17. Does not the ultimate 

 value of the "scrip" depend upon 

 the loss made on foreign sales and 

 the expense of operating the Gov- 

 ernment's agencies. If the "scrip" 

 so issued depends on these un- 

 certain elements, and if it can be 

 transferred, does it no^ present a 

 splendid opportiinity for specula- 

 tion and fraud? 



(a) If it does furnish such op- 

 portunities, are the penalties pro- 

 vided sufficient, inasmuch as they 

 are only civil penalties? 

 They'd Be Bribed 



18. At the present time, there 

 are frauds in every Department of 

 the Government so far investi- 

 gated, and civic honesty seems to 

 be at a discount. Even Cabinet 

 Members have been bribed. 



(a) When conditions are as 

 above indicated, is it not unwise 

 to create another Department such 

 as is contemplated in this bill, 

 and with a large personnel of of- 

 ficials, all of whom would be sub- 

 jected to unusual temptations in 

 the matter of bribes, etc.? 

 Lots of E\|>erinients, He Thinks 



19. During the period of the 

 World War, and since then, is it 

 not true that every sort of experi- 

 ment in Government control of 

 food prices has been tried in this 

 country and abroad? 



(a) Can you point to any 

 method so far adopted by this 

 Government in the matter of con- 

 trolling food prices ^hich has been 

 successful? 



(b) Has not every method 

 adopted so far in numerous bills 

 passed by Congress, all of which 

 your organization has advocated, 

 resulted merely in increasing the 

 overhead of farmers by giving 

 them more enticing opportunities 

 for borrowing money? 



(cl Will you call ray attention 

 to a single Instance in the world 

 of a satisfactory maintenance of 



price of food products over a con- 

 siderable period of time? 



20. is it not true that the only 

 way to maintain a price is to have 

 a bu.ver willing and able to take 

 everything offered at the price 

 specified? 



(a) Will this bill have that ef- 

 fect? 



Will It Increa.se Acrease? 



21. If the fixed price is high 

 enough to do the farmer any good, 

 will it not have the effect of in- 

 creasing the acreage? 



(a) Your answer to the above 

 must, of course, be Yes; and, if 

 the acreage is increased and the 

 production of the product is con- 

 tinually increased will not the in- 

 creased production make it al- 

 ways more and more diflTicult to 

 maintain a price level? 



Oklahoma Wheat Growers 



22. In the same mail which 

 brought me your letter this morn- 

 ing, I received information to the 

 effect that the Oklahoma Wheat 

 Growers Association, consisting of 

 11,000 producers of wheat de- 

 nounce the McNary-Haugen bill as 

 a new and dangerous burden to be 

 borne by the farmer. 



(a) Oklahoma is a great wheat 

 producing state. They produce 

 about as much wheat as we do in 

 Illinois. In 1920 they produced 

 over 54,000,000 bushels. In that 

 year we produced in Illinois only 

 45,000,000 bushels. The 1920 

 wheat production in Oklahoma is 

 a larger production than we have 

 ever attained in Illinois from 1909 

 to the present time, except in 1922 

 when we produced slightly more 

 than this. 



Have They Stn<lie<1 It? 



(b) Oklahoma farmers are more 

 vitally interested in wheat than 

 Illinois farmers. Their production 

 of corn in Oklahoma is negligible 

 as compared to our production. 

 They produce usually about l-5th 

 as much corn in Oklahoma as we 

 produce. 



(c) It is therefore reasonable to 

 suppose that the Oklahoma Wheat 

 Growers Association have given as 

 much study to the subject as the 

 Illinois Agricultural Association. 



(d) How do you account for the 

 absolutely dillerent conclusion 

 reached by thei Oklahoma Wheat 

 experts as contrasted with the con- 

 clusion your Organization has 

 reached? 



(e) What is a Member of Con- 

 gress to do when two agricultural 

 organizations — equally important 

 and equally interested — reach 

 such absolutely different conclu- 

 sions? 



(f) Under these circumstances, 

 do you think you have the right to 

 demand that a ' Member of Con- 

 gress from Illinois shall "unquali- 

 fiedly and actively support and 

 vote for" the McNary-Haugen 

 bill? 



Think.s We .Adiise<1 Re<lnction 



23. Under the advice of Agri- 

 cultural Organizations in Illinois, 

 including I think the Illinois Agri- 

 cultural Association, farmers have 

 been urged to restrict wheat 

 acreage and to use wheat land 

 for other crops, in order to bring 

 up the price of wheat. 



(a) Acting upon this advice a 

 great many farmers in Illinois 

 have sown less wheat. If tbe 

 position of the proponents of this 

 legislation is correct, and tbe Mc- 

 Nary-Haugen bill produces a bet- 

 ter price for wheat, how can you 

 square yourself with those farmers 



who have accepted your advice 

 and who have sown less wheat? 

 <ioveriiinent in Grain Business 



24. Would not the .McNary- 

 Haugen bill put the Federal Gov- 

 ernment actively into the grain 

 business? 



(a) Your answer, of course, 

 must be in the affirmative to the 

 above question. If the Govern- 

 ment goes actively into the grain 

 business, can you think of any 

 reason why it should not engage in 

 other kinds of business? And. if 

 it engages in other kinds of busi- 

 ness, why not in all other kinds 

 of business? 



(b) Is your proposition, there- 

 fore, not socialistic? Will it not 

 lead to the same results if carried 

 out logically that the movements 

 in Russia have attained? 



Compares It With Bolshevism 



(c) But, the Russian Soviets 

 could not succeed in any measure 

 until they took over also the land. 

 Would you not regard this result 

 as destructive of all our ideals and 

 of civilization itself? 



(d) Fortunately, however, even 

 in Russia the Government has now 

 abandoned the control of land and 

 has commenced recently to recog- 

 nize absolute free trade in bread 

 grains. 



(e) Do you not think the Rus- 

 sian experiment with its dead 

 numbering over 7,000,000 ought 

 \o dissuade our people from pro* 

 ceeding in that direction? 



(f) Would we not be proceeding 

 in that direction if we accepted in 

 this particular the advice of the 

 Illinois Agricultural Association? 



Wonders If We Know What 

 We're Dolni; 



25. I have commenced to re- 

 ceive communications from Farm 

 Bureaus in Illinois, evidently in- 

 spired by your letter to me, which 

 I am now discussing. These com- 

 munications are all couched prac- 

 tically in the same language, and 

 all "insist that our representatives 

 in Congress unqualifiedly and ac- 

 tively support and vote for" the 

 McNary-Haugen bill. 



(a) Do you contend that the 

 Farm Bureau advisers who are 

 now sending these Resolutions to 

 Members of Congress have studied 

 the question; or, have they simply 

 accepted your advice? 



(b) If they have studied this 

 most Important question and 

 reached these conclusions for 

 themselves, how does it happen 

 that in their Resolutions they use 

 the exact language you use in your 

 communication to me? 



(c) Do you really think a con- 

 scientious Member of Congress 

 ought to be influenced by propa- 

 ganda of this kind; or, do you 

 think he ought to reason these 

 matters out and study them care- 

 fully? 



(d) Do you think a Member 

 of Congress ought to become a 

 mere rubber stamp to record the 

 impressions of the Illinois Agri- 

 cultural Association? 



MEMORANDA 



I have suggested hurriedly 

 above only a part of the objec- 

 tions which occur to me now to 

 the legislation you so enthusiasti- 

 cally champion; and I am asking 

 for a full and satisfactory reply 

 from you before I can consent to 

 vote as you have demanded that 

 I vote in this matter. 



You will pardon me I am sure 

 for Imposing upon you the burden 

 of replying to this communication, 

 but. Inasmuch as you "demand" 

 that tbe Representatives in Con- 



gress from Illinois unqualifiedly 

 and actively support the McNary- 

 Haugen bill. I feel that 1 have the 

 right to demand and unqualifiedly 

 insist that you, as the head of the 

 Illinois Agricultural Association, 

 which stands for this bill, favor 

 me with a reply to all the above 

 suggestions, so that I can print in 

 the Congressional Record, if poss- 

 ible in parallel columns, this let- 

 ter of inquiry addressed to you 

 and your reply to the same. 

 Deplorable (\>n<lltion 



I realize that Agriculture is in 

 a deplorable condition, but it can 

 be made much worse than it is 

 by the adoption of dangerous 

 methods of relief. Since the World 

 War many suggestions have been 

 made for stabilizini; prices, rang- 

 ing from the commodity dollar of 

 Irvin:; Fisher (which seems plaus- 

 ible and possible), and the "Bar- 

 ley dollar" of some of the Balkan 

 states, to the vague and Indefinite 

 agricultural "scrip" proposed by 

 this bill. It would be much easier 

 for me in an agricultural district 

 like mine, so far as the next elec- 

 tion goes, to accept your sugges- 

 tions and .ivoid the implied threat 

 which goes with them, than to op- 

 pose this bill. But, a Member of 

 Congress is required to take an 

 oath and assume an obligation in 

 all these matters; and, therefore, 

 before making up my mind un- 

 qualifiedly to support the measure 

 for which you stand, I am address- 

 ing this communication to you. If 

 your answers are satisfactory and 

 remove the doubts in my mind, 

 I will support it. If your answer 

 is not satisfactory I expect to vote 

 a.gainst the bill a;- it stands now. 

 -Answers Will Have Great Weight 



Inasmuch as I have immediately 

 responded to your letter (I re- 

 ceived your letter of March 10th 

 only a few minutes ago). I ani 

 asking you to show me a like 

 courtesy by immediately respond- 

 ing to this communication, so that 

 in reaching my conclusions I can 

 have the benefit of your reply. 1 

 am assuming, of course, that you 

 have studied the question, and 

 that you are an expert in these 

 matters, and therefore your 

 answers will have great weight 

 with me, and I am sure with many 

 other Members of Congress. 



It has become the habit in ibis 

 dangerous period of our economic 

 life as a nation, for Members of 

 Congress to vote for a measure 

 upon the theory that it is the only 

 relief proposed, and that while ft 

 Is not everything that could be 

 desired, still it promises some- 

 thing. This is the excuse many 

 Members of Congress make for 

 supporting some of the vague in- 

 definite propositions now sub- 

 mitted. The passage of a mea- 

 sure, however, so revolutionary as 

 this measure, so destructive of all 

 our present systems of exchange 

 and marketing, involving the poss- 

 ible destruction of the present pri- 

 mary markets for farmers is 

 fraught with grave possibilities, 

 and may result in untold injury to 

 an industry which is now almost 

 prostrate. 

 Don't Think "Scrip" Will Help 



Farmers of the country are in 

 a desperate condition. I do not 

 think you can allay their suspic- 

 ions nor restore their confidence 

 by handing to them in part pay- 

 ment for things they produce a 

 "scrip" about the value of which 

 we can know nothing except that 

 It will not be worth Its face. With 



(Concluded on page 5) |I 



April 



Thi 

 Agi 



In sh 

 to incre 

 the cred 

 market, 

 eminent 

 creased 

 ately in 

 credit, 

 scrip as 

 tend to 

 whether 

 jection i 

 most wi 

 An 

 If yot 

 the pric< 

 to a fair 

 er) and 

 the grou 

 eirculati 

 more to 

 all admi 

 less thai 

 oppositi( 

 that yo 

 farmcrf 

 less tha 

 to do 

 the cir( 

 credit g 

 objectio 

 moral a 

 careful I 

 it. 



Regar 

 other P( 

 tablishes 

 to buy 

 It authc 

 - emit its ( 

 smaller 

 by indu 

 nancing 

 extent tl 

 gallons ( 

 may pas 

 negotiab 



I the medi 

 Such 

 tary cus 



, the Unil 

 much SI 

 common 



' custom ' 

 latter cu 

 ly and i 



' tion to 

 "expand 

 a brave 



' nothing. 



You a 



' be satis 



r part paj 



a farme 



a bushi 



ample, : 



»1.55, 4 



ing In < 



. will he 



the 10 



' think t 



You 

 have a i 



' it will 

 Wheat 

 the spe 

 precise! 

 that wl 

 no less, 

 et shop 

 wheat i 

 less. 



Wha 

 or inde 



' this Is 

 any mc 

 agrlcul 

 «Uy" tl 



ib. 



