180 



For. 4: 128-155. 

 Hin.R-R- 1948. Evidence of resis- 

 once to blister rust ty eaittm 

 white pine growing in the 

 Northeaii-J. For. 46: 911-915. 

 Hofacker.T.H. 1993. United 

 Slates Department of Agri- 

 culture. Forest Service Staff 

 EniomologisL MerrK>nuiduin of 

 meeong on May 28, 1995 

 (undated). 

 Hoff. R andS. Haglc. 1989. 

 Diseases of whiiebark pine with 

 spedal emphasis on white pine 

 blister rust. In Proceedings — 

 Symposium on Whiiebark Pine 

 Ecosystems; Ecology and Man- 

 agement of a High-Mountain 

 Resource. Boicman, MT. March 

 29-31. 1989. Schmidt. WC. and 

 K.J McDonald. Compilers pp, 

 179.190. 

 Hollenhorst. S J., S.M Brock. WX 

 Fremund and M J Twery 1995 

 Predjcung the effecu of gypsy 

 moth on ncar^aew aesthetic 

 preferences and recreation 

 appeal For Science 39: 28-40. 

 Houston. D.R^ and H-T Valcnunc 

 1988 Beech bark disease: the 

 temporal patterns of cankering 

 in aftermath forests of Maine 

 Can J For. Res 18: 58-42. 

 Hunt. J 1957. Earty History of 

 Pon-Orford Cedar Root Rol 

 Unpublished report to US 

 Department of Agriculture. 

 Foresi Service. Padfic 

 Northwest Forest and Range 

 Expenment Siauon. 2 pages 

 (^<Zobel noL 1985) 

 Johnson. K.D 1980 Fraser fir and 

 woolly balsam adelgid: a sum- 

 marv of informauon Southern 

 Appalachian Research/ 

 Resource Management Coop- 

 erative. Western Carolina 

 Universiry. Cullowhee. North 

 Carolina. 62 pages. 

 Kamoiky. D.F- 1979. Dutch Elm 

 Disease: A Review of the 

 History. Environmental Impli- 

 cations. Control, and Research 

 Needs- Environmental Con- 

 servation. Vol. 6. no, 4. 1979 

 Ketcham. D E-. CA. Wallner, and 



S.S. Evans, Jr. 1968. Western 

 white pine management pro- 

 grams realigned on northern 

 Rocky Mountain National 

 Forests. J. Forestry 6: 529-352. 

 Kendall. K.C and S.F. Amo. 1969. 

 Whitebark pine — an important 

 but endangered wildlife species. 

 In Proceedings — Symposium on 

 Whitebark Pine Ecosyitem: 

 Emlogy and Management of a 

 High-Moimtain Resource. 

 Bozeman.ML March 29-51, 

 1989. Schmidt, W.C and K.J. 

 McDonald. Compilers, pp. 264- 

 275. 

 Kimberling. D.N..J.C Miller, and 

 R.L. Penrose. 1986. "Dittribi*- 

 tion and Parasitism of Winter 

 Moth. OptrophWa bntmaUi 

 (Lepidoptera Ceometridae). in 

 Western Oregon." Environ- 

 mental Entomology. Vol. 15. 

 No. 5. October. 1986. 

 KlieJunas.J. and D. Adams. 1980. 

 "An Evaluation of Phytophthora 

 Root Rot of Port-Orford<edar 

 in California." United States 

 Department of Agriculture. 

 Forest Service. Region Five, 

 Report No 80-1 . November 

 1980. 

 Kolinsky, J. 191 6. The European 

 fir trunk louse, Oumus 

 (Dnjpuui) fnua* (Ratx.). EnL 

 Proc See Washington 18: 14- 

 16. 

 Kucera. DR. 1992- New introduc- 

 tion. Common pine shoot bee- 

 tle. Pest Alert, United Sotes 

 Department of Agiiculture. 

 Forest Service, Northeastern 

 Area. NA-PR-??-92. 

 LaFlamme. G. and D. LaChance. 

 1987. Large infection center of 

 Sdcroderhs canker {European 

 Race) in Quebec Prtjvence. 

 Plant Dis. 71: 1041-1045. 

 Langdon. Keith. 1991. Great 

 Smoky Mountains National 

 Park, in letter from Carroll 

 Schell. to F.T. Campbell. 

 December 1991. 

 Latun.J.D. Oregon Sate 

 University DepartiT*ent of 

 Entomology. Personal commu- 

 nications to F.T. Campbell. 



LaudermJich, G, M Parker. 

 Skinner, and Teillon (eds.). 

 Proceedings. Regional Meeting: 

 "The 1968 thrips infestation of 

 sugar maple". 1968. Benning- 

 ton. VTJune 25. 1988. Vt Agr. 

 Exp. Sta. Bull. 696 Univ. Vt.. 

 Burlington. 

 Ledig, FT. 1992. Human Impaco 

 on Genetic Diversity in Forest 

 Ecosystems. Oikos 63: 87-108. 

 Copenhagen 1991 

 Lorimer. N. Stafif Entomologist, 

 Foreti Pest Management, 

 United States Department of 

 Agriculture, Forett Service, 

 Washington. D.C Personal 

 oommimicadon to F.T. 

 Campbell. 

 MacQeery, D W. 1992. American 

 forests. A history of resiliency 

 and recovery. United States 

 Department of Agriculture. 

 Forest Service FS-540, 59 pages. 

 Magasi. L,P. and S.E Pond. 1982. 

 European larch canker A new 

 disease in Canada and a new 

 North American host record. 

 Plant Dii. 66: 559 

 May. C 1950. Dutch elm disease in 



Ohio. Sdence 72: 142-143. 

 Mazzone, H.M. andj W. Peacock. 

 1985. Prospecu for control of 

 Dutch elm disease — biological 

 oonsiderations.J. Arboriculture 

 11:285-292. 

 Mcaure. MS. 1987. Biology and 

 control of hemlock woolly adel- 

 gid. Connect. Ag. Exp. Sta. Bull. 

 851. 9 pages. 

 McQure. M.S. 1989. Evidence of a 

 polymorphic life cycle in the 

 hemlock woolly adelgid. Adti^a 

 tjugat (Homopterx Adelgidae). 

 Ann. Entomol. Soc Am. 82: 50- 

 54. 

 McOure, M.S. 1991. Connecticut 

 Agricultural Experiment St»- 

 tion, New Haven. "Control of 

 HcnUock Woolly Adelgid." 

 \^keeNuneiy, Spring, 1991. 



McCovem, T. Operations OCDcer, 

 Domestic and Emergency 

 Operations. United Sutes 

 Department of Agriculture, 

 Animal and Plant Health 



Page 36 



