235 



NOTES AND REFERENCES I39 



76. Office of Technology Assnsmrni. AgncuUyral Reuanh and Techmoiogy Tnnifrr Policiei 

 for ihr (y^oj. March n^^o. pp. i,. 7. 



77. Girncgir Gimmiuion on Science. Technology, and Government, op. cil., note 1 ibovc 

 7N. Draft Final Report of the Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Task force on the Depart- 

 ment of Energy National Laboratories. January 19. 1991. 



79. Executive Office of the President. U.S. Actioni for a Btller BimronmemI: A SuilaimcJ 

 Commilmenl. Washington. DC. 1991.. 



*>o. International Conference on an Agenda of ScierKc for Environment and Development 

 into the list Century (ASCEND u). Vienna. Austria. November n-19, 1991. organized by the 

 Intcfnaiional Council of Scientific Unions (ICSU) in cooperation with ihc Thud V((orld Academy 

 of Sciences (TWAS) 



81. S. 1.S66. intrcxluced in the lotnd Congress, establishes a program 10 assist in the deploy- 

 ment of energy and environmental practices and technologies: the program would be called the 

 "ADEPT' program. 



81. Carnegie Commission on Science. Technology, and Government. Inlenuiliona/ Ennron- 

 mentai Ktiearch and Assessment: Proposals for Better Organization and Decision Making, July 

 1991. p. 11. 



8^ Alexander Kcynan "The United States as a Panner in Scientific and Technological 

 Cooperation: Some Perspectives from Across the Atlantic." Consultant repon to the Carnegie Com- 

 mission on Science. Technology, and Government. June 1991. 



8^. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Unfinished Business, Washington, DC. 1987. 



8^. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Reducing Risk: Setting Priorities and Strategies 

 for Environmental Protection, Washington. DC. September 1990. 



86 Ecological Society of America. "Sustainable Biosphere Initiative: An Unctological Research 

 Agenda." reprinted from Ecology 71(1). April 1991. 



87. Carnegie Commission on Science. Technology, and Government, TLr limits ofGorem- 

 ment in Science and Technology: Roles and Challenges for Nongovernmental Organiiatiora, in press. 



88. Charles W Powers, op cit., note ;j. above 



89. Ibtd. 



90. Kathleen M Gramp. Albt-n H. Teich. and Stephen D. Nelson. "Federal Funding of 

 Environmental R&D." 3 report to the National Academy of Sciences and the Carnegie Commission 

 on Science. Technology, and Government by the American Association for the Advancement of 

 Science. 



91. A number of these programs were discussed at the University Colloquium on Environ- 

 mental Research and Education held in Raleigh. Nonh Carolina, on September 1-4-16. 1991. 

 Information on the proceedings of the Colloquium may be obtained from Sigma Xi, the Scientific 

 Research Society. 99 Alexander Drive, PO Box 15975. Research Triangle Park. NC 17709. 



91. Lester R. Brown. "Launching the Environmental Revolution." in Slate of the V/orlds^^i. 

 WorldWatch Institute. W. W. Norton. New York. 1991. p. 17V 



95. Jim MacNeill. Director of the Environment and Sustainable Development Program at 

 the Institute for Research on Public Policy in Ottawa. Canada, quoted in Cheryl Simon Silver 

 with Ruth S. DeFries. op. cit., note 7 above, p. 60. 



94. Regulatory Program of the U.S. Government. 1 April s^^ - }i March 1991, p. vii. 



95. Steven J. Kafka, op. cit., note 16 above. Figure 5. p. 10. 



96. An Evaluation ofEPAs Exploratory Grants Program, a repon prepared for OER by American 

 Management Systenu. Inc., April 1988. 



97 . National Academy of Public Administration. EPA's Office of Research and Development: 

 leadership and Staff for a New Agenda, July ij^o. 



9S. An Evaluation of EPA's Exploratory Ri..jrch Grants Program, op. cit.. note 96 above 



99. U,S Environmental Protection Agency. Safeguarding the Future: Credible Science. Cred- 

 ible Decisions. March 1991 



too. National Research Council. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program: Interim 

 Report. National Academy Press. Washington. DC. June 1991. 



101. National Science Foundation FY 1991 Budget Justification 



101. This figure does not include $16) million to support the National Environment Saielliie, 

 Data, and Information Ser\'ice. 



