258 



What does "world leadership" in a particular field 

 of science mean? What particular benefits accrue 

 to the "world leader" versus "number two"? Why 

 should national policy makers care whether or not 

 the nation is first, second, or third in a given 

 field of science? 



Being the world leader in a scientific field produces 

 benefits far beyond the obvious prestige and re- 

 cognition. A recognized leader becomes a magnet 

 for talent and creativity impacting far more than 

 the relatively small number of people who work 

 directly in. the field. The world leader sets the 

 direction and pace in the field. It attracts the 

 best talent from a worldwide talent base and spurs 

 the healthy competition that leads to success. 

 Being first in a particular field brings with it 

 a sense of excitement and pride that doesn't exist 

 with being number two or three. The best and 

 brightest talent are attracted to number one, not 

 number two. Leadership stimulates interest in 

 science and excellence far across society inevitably 

 spinning off new ideas and new technologies. 



National leaders should be concerned about U.S. 

 scientific leadership because being a world leader 

 ultimately brings with it the technological spinoffs 

 and trained talent base to develop and support a 

 growing economy as well as national security 

 requirements. 



