392 



LANDSCAPE DESIGN 



Impression, esthetic, 19 



Impressions, artist's acquisition of, 12 



Inclosing plantations, of trees, note, 155; 

 design, 167-71 ; in apportionment of es- 

 tate area, 274; 



informal or naturalistic : in modern 

 American landscape style, 59 ; in composi- 

 tion, 128; suggestions from pond shore 

 forms, 138; texture considerations, 158; 

 eflFects of foliage color, 160-61 ; design, 

 168-70; avoidance of formal edgings, 171 ; 

 herbaceous plants in, 176-77; compared to 

 walls and fences, 204 



Inclosure, of a landscape composition, 90; 

 of a garden, 234, 240-42 



India, Moghul style of landscape design in, 

 36-39; ref.,2,6s 



Individuality, in ideals, 21; in taste, 24-26; 

 in style, 28-29 



Informal, indefiniteness of term, 34 



Informal design, of American small estates, 

 59; maintenance, 61; composition de- 

 pendent on occult balance, 97; pictorial 

 composition, 122; objects in, according to 

 their design value, 128-29; inclosing plan- 

 tations in, 167-70; specimen trees and 

 shrubs in, 173; shrubs in, 176; statuary 

 in, 212; roads in French so-called informal 

 design, note, 225 



Informal gardens, 237, 259, 261 



Informal styles, a category, 33-34 



Intellection, process, 7-8 ; sources of pleasure 

 in, lo-ll ; pleasure or displeasure of, in dis- 

 covery of an illusion, 1 17-18 



Intensity of color, in color composition, 

 106-7, 109, no; in landscape composition, 

 in; in representation on landscape plans, 



348 

 Iron grilles, in fences and gates, 208-9 

 Irrigation, in Moghul gardens, 38 

 Islands, as elements in design, 138; ref., 



369 



Isola Bella, 41, 120 



Italian villas, compared to Moghul gardens, 

 37; of Renaissance and Baroque periods, 

 styles of, 39-42 ; their influence in England, 

 49; associational incongruity in New Eng- 

 land, 60; associational pleasure in, 61; 

 demarcation from surroundings, 191 ; refs., 

 367, 376 



Japanese styles of landscape design, 54-57; 

 spirit of, compared to modern American 

 landscape style, 59; relative scale in, loi ; 

 symbolic use of plants in, note, 167 



Jekyll, Gertrude, note, 210; refs., 370, 372, 



373. 375 

 Jets, fountain, 36, 38, 215, 216 

 Johnson, George W., ref., 365 

 Johnson, J. B., note, 344 

 Jones, Beatrix, ref., 368 



Karnes, Lord, quoted, note, 83 

 Kansas City, Mo., " Country Club Dis- 

 trict," note, 291 

 Kehr, Cyrus, note, 322; ref., 379 

 Kellaway, Herbert J., ref., 374 

 Kemp, Edward, ref., 374 

 Kennion, Edward, ref., 370-71 

 Kent, William, 45 



Kimball, Theodora, note, 337; refs., 362, 380 

 Klopstock, Friedrich Gottlieb, 45 

 Knole, note, 49 

 Knots, 48 

 Koch, Hugo, note, 102; refs., 365, 368, 378 



Labor, utilization in landscape construction, 



352 



Laborde, Alexandre de, note, 47 



Lakes, effect of large lake compared to that 

 of prairie, 64; apparent extent increased, 

 117; effects on observer, 136; as elements 

 in design, 137-38; effect of continuity in- 

 creased, 141 



Lamour, Jean, ironwork, 209 



Land subdivision, as type of landscape de- 

 sign, 232, 275-94; 3S a business venture, 

 275 ; items of expense to the developer, 



275-76; 



salable assets produced by development, 

 276-78 : room, 276-77 ; proximity to town, 

 277; convenience, 277; social desirability, 

 277; amenity, 277; beauty, 277-78 ; 



" low-cost " and " high-cost " develop- 

 ments, 278-80; professional advice in, 280; 

 procedure in design, 280-91 ; choice of 

 type of development in relation to develop- 

 ment of city, 280-82 ; 



street system, 282-83 ; alleys, 282-83 ; 

 characteristic effects of street systems, 

 283 ; streets in relation to topography, 



