51 



been enough of an effort to distribute program funding as broadly as this kind of partnership 

 program would warrant. For example, over the program's first three years there have only 

 been six non-governmental partners in the United States to receive NAWCA funding, and 

 four of these represent game-species interests. We on the Council must work hard to make 

 sure that groups like Partners in Flight, who share mutual interests and who can bring 

 resources and good projects to the Council, can be guaranteed a seat at the table. 



In a climate of continued conflict over wetlands regulation, the NAWCA stands in 

 sharp contrast as a highly effective, conflict-free, and relatively efficient means of wetlands 

 conservation. Here is a volunteer program quietly but powerfully making great strides in 

 wetlands acquisition, restoration, and enhancement. Good projects are getting funded, and 

 many long-lasting partnerships have been created through the NAWCA to keep momentum 

 going. 



The National Fish and Wildlife Foundation was one of the earliest and most ardent 

 supporters of this program. We continue to be one of NAWCA's most ardent supporters. 

 This is a program that has produced substantial gains for wetlands and wetland-dependant 

 species, and deserves reauthorization and substantially increased funding levels. Thank you. 



