246 



(C-3) Do you think other states are also faced with this 

 same issue? 



If not at the present time, many states will be faced 

 with similar problems and issues. This could 

 potentially occur in any state in which the disposal 

 of dredged materials is practiced and in which the 

 sediments are contaminated by toxic substances. Give 

 our industrialized and urbanized society, the problem 

 will doubtless arise in other areas of the country. 

 Dioxin contamination of river, estuarine, or marine 

 sediment is not limited to New York Harbor. 



(D) You also mention that there is a need to reduce 

 non-point sources of harbor pollution because it is 

 considered to be a substantial source of contaminated 

 sediments. Are there currently any efforts underway in 

 New Jersey to address this? If so, what are they? If 

 not, are there any management plans currently being 

 developed to address runoff pollution? 



The previously noted seven-point initiative, as well 

 as actions being evaluated under the HEP, will address 

 non-point source pollution issues. The state has 

 begun to implement a comprehensive Stormwater 

 Management Program, and has been evaluating the 

 impacts of Combined Sewer Overflows. The New Jersey 

 Sewerage Infrastructure Improvement Act, which 

 provides funds to municipalities for the mapping and 

 improvement of stormwater systems, is currently in 

 operation . 



(E) Do you feel that states should have a greater role in 

 the permitting process? If so, what recommendations would 

 you make? 



At the present time, the states have adequate 

 authority to involve themselves fully in the federal 

 permitting process. As noted above, however, there is 

 a need to develop scientifically based ocean disposal 

 standards . 



(F-l) How actively did the public participate in the 

 permitting process for the Port Newark-Port Elizabeth 

 permit? 



The public has been actively involved in the 

 permitting process. Concern centers around lack of 

 public involvement in the development and 

 establishment of the ocean disposal criteria for 

 dioxin. This concern is justified. 



(F-2) In your testimony you mention that there is a need 

 to provide meaningful information to the public regarding 

 science-based risk associated with dioxin and other 

 contaminants. Are there any efforts along this line 

 currently underway? If so, could you give me an example? 

 If not, are there any efforts being developed that would 

 provide necessary information to the public so that they 

 have a greater understanding of the potential health 

 threats associated with contaminated sediments? 



