117 



94 /APPENDIX C 



For their assistance in data gathering, preparation, and consultation the ct 

 mittee extends its thanks to the following individuals: Harriet Dustan, member. 

 Institute of Medicine; Ed Roccella, coordinator, National High Blood Pressure Edui 

 tion Program; Rebecca Henderson, associate professor of management, Massachu- 

 setts Institute of Technolog}-; Russell Hemdon and Robert Tuohy, Defense Research 

 and Engineering, Department of Defense; Harvey Brooks, professor of technology 

 and public policy, John E Kennedy School of Government. Harvard Universirv-; 

 Bruce Fonoroff, Army Research Laborator); Howard Garrison, Federation of Ameri- 

 can Societies for Experimental BiologA-; Roben Levy, president, Wyeth-Ayerst Re- 

 search; Stanley Trice, analyst. Defense Research and Engineering, Department of 

 Defense; Jane Bortnick Griffiths, acting chief. Science and Technology- Division, 

 Congressional Research Sersice; Genevieve Knezo, Congressional Research Servic 

 Richard Rowberg, Smithsonian Institution; Kei Koizumi. Kathie Gramp, and AITe 

 American Association for the Advancement of Science; Roben Smith; David Gust 

 Rutgers University; Philip Smith; Marvin Ebel, Council on Governmental Relation 

 John Jankowski, Ronald Meeks, and Linda Parker, National Science Foundation; 

 David Kingsbury, director. Genome Database, John Hopkins Universit)'; Michael 

 Crow, Columbia University; Ann Markusen. Rutgers University-; Donald Stokes, 

 Center for Advanced Study; Richard Nelson, Columbia Universirv-; Kitrv' Giiman, 

 National Science and Technology Council; Donna Fossimi and Tim Webb, Critical 

 Technologies Institute. RAND; J. Michael Bishop, University- of California, San Fran- 

 cisco; Marjory Blumenthal, director. Computer Science and Telecommunications 

 Board. National Research Council; A. Michael Spence, chair. Committee on Science 

 Technology-, and Economic Policy, National Academy of Sciences; Bob Bayer, Depart- 

 ment of Defense; Bob Meisner. 



To gather views from a broad range of interests, the committee organized 

 outreach sessions to help frame its observations and recommendations. The first 

 session was held at Stanford University- on February 21. 1995. Another was held at 

 the Universirs- of Texas at Austin on April ~. To continue the dialogue the committee 

 also took advantage of previously scheduled meetings such as the American Associa- 

 tion for the Advancement of Science annual meeting, the Sigma Xi Forum, and the 

 annual meetings of the National Academies of Sciences and Engineering. The com- 

 mittee is grateful to all those who attended its outreach sessions and to the follow- 

 ing individuals for their assistance with its outreach efforts: Gerhard Casper, presi- 

 dent, Stanford Universin-; Charles Kruger. vice provost for research and policy. 

 Stanford Universir\-; Kathy Eslinger, executive assistant to the vice provost for re- 

 search and policy-. Stanford University-; and Nanc>- Mallor\- and Susie Pruett. assistants to 

 the vice president of research and development, Universin- of Texas at Austin. 



Finally, the committee would like to recognize the special contributions of 

 both the National Research Council staff and the independent consultants who 

 served on the study: Norman Metzger. executive director of the Commission on 

 Phvsical Sciences. Mathematics, and Applications, who ser\'ed as the study director; 

 Robert Cook-Deegan of the Institute of Medicine, who served as the senior progran 

 officer; Michael McGearv-, Christopher T Hill, and Patrick Young, who served as coi 

 sultants; Julie Esanu, for the program and research assistance provided to the com 

 minee; Danielle Dehmler. for the staff support for the committee and for her work in 

 — »;cript;and Susan Maurizi. who edited the final mfln..<^'--— 



