139 



47 



1 alter the terms of any final judicial decree confirming or 



2 determining water rights. Notwithstanding any other pro- 



3 vision of reclamation law, the judgment entered December 



4 30, 1986, by the United States District Court of the East- 



5 em District of California in the consolidated cases entitled 



6 Barcellos and Wolfsen, Inc., et al. v. Westlands Water 



7 District, et al. (No. CV 78-106 EDP) and Westlands 



8 Water District, et al. v. United States, et al. (No. CV F 



9 81-245 EDP), shall be deemed an existing long-term 



10 water service contract, which shall be renewable pursuant 



1 1 to section 3404(c) of this title.". 



12 (c) Technical Amendment. — Section 3408(h)(2) 



13 of the Central Valley Project Improvement Act (106 Stat. 



14 4729) is amended by striking out "(h)(i)" and inserting 



15 in lieu thereof "(h)(1)". 



16 (d) Stanislaus River. — Section 3408 of the 



17 Central Valley Project Improvement Act (106 Stat 4730) 



18 is amended by adding at the end the following: 



19 "(e)(1) The Secretary shall identify the water supply 



20 impacts resulting from the reallocation of Stanislaus River 



21 water for fish and wildlife purposes under this title, and 



22 no later than two years after the date of enactment of 



23 the Central Valley Project Reform Act of 1995, develop 



24 and implement a plan to provide long term replacement 



25 water in an amount equal to the identified water supply 



•HR 1906 IH 



