90 



the songbirds that were killed. People think about that: he sat 

 there and watched songbirds. 



You know, this officer, very frankly, I hope they review him and 

 just find out where attitudes are. Like you say, you cannot legislate 

 attitudes, unfortunately, but you can cut their money off. And we 

 are reviewing that budget right now. 



I want to thank you two gentlemen for being so patient. 



Ms. Chenoweth. Mr. Chairman? 



The Chairman. Yes? 



Ms. Chenoweth. I know the hour is late, but I just have one 

 small comment that I wanted to make. In the Manning case — with 

 your permission. 



The Chairman. Go ahead. 



Ms. Chenoweth. In the Manning case, the court ruled that the 

 Court of Appeals must view the evidence in the light most favor- 

 able to the Government, giving the Government the benefit of all 

 reasonable inferences which may be drawn from the evidence. And, 

 you know, I just have to say that this is one reason why I have 

 joined with Mr. Riggs. Whether you agree or not, I have agreed 

 with Mr. Riggs in putting forth a bill that will limit the terms of 

 years that a Federal judge can hold that position. Because I think 

 they get in that position, and they are not accountable to anyone 

 any longer. And so, they have fun fashioning laws to their own per- 

 sonal pleasure. 



The Chairman. I thank the gentlelady. 



And thank you, gentlemen. This does, at this time, close this 

 hearing. I hope we see some results from it. 



[Whereupon, at 5:01 p.m., the Committee was adjourned; and the 

 following was submitted for the record:] 



