r~i 



I 



n 



LTl 



~7K- 



?-■ V 



JJ^sulS 



6^44 smUlS 4632 4 p4^^2ii^ 



im 



6<>33 51 



3 4 



IV 



49 '^''^^fri^fm V 



6 583^5 2574^3, m^ i 19 /sViliJ 2 5 39 W 



4 24 



2666 47 5 6 5 



2 3 



* ^iH 



5 



VI 



published by Nettleship based on Ciinier's records with later additions ) 

 -ffected man {I?J^) who married the affected woman (D/^) is represented 



,^h the afifected, showing that the condition is due to a dominant factor, 

 not De said that the responsible factor is a simple allelomorph. Nevcr- 

 nt ot a do m man t variety. 



\^o vin 



X 



