190 ARATJCAKITES. 



PINOIDEJE ABIETINEJE ARAU- . Araucarites cf. Conites elegans (Carr.), 

 CARINJE. etc. 



Araucarites, sp. 

 PINOIDEJE ABIETINEJE ABIETINJE . Pinites Dunkeri, Carr. 



Pinites Carruthersi, Gard. 



Pinites Solmsi, sp. nov. 



Pinites Euffordi, sp. nov. 



Pinites, sp. 

 PINOIDEJE ABIETINEJE TAXODIINJE Sphenolepidium Kurrianum (Dunk.). 



Sphenolepidium Sternbergianum (Dunk.). 



Sphenolepidium cf. S. subulatum (Heer). 

 PINOIDEJE CUPRESSINEJE .... Thuites, sp. 



TAXODIEJE PODOCARPEJE .... Nageiopsis, sp., cf. N. heterophylla, Font. 

 GENERA ET SPECIES INCERTJE SEDIS . Pagiophyllum crassifolium, Schenk. 



Pagiophyllum, sp. 



Brachyphylhtm obesum, Heer. 



Eraehyphyllwm spinosum, sp. nov. 



In the above list of Coniferce described in this volume, I have 

 suggested the probable position of various species in the classifica- 

 tion adopted in Engler and Prantl's recent work. It must, 

 however, be admitted that at present we cannot feel great con- 

 fidence in the attempts to determine, even the approximate affinities 

 of such provisional genera as Sphenolepidium, Pagiophyllum, and 

 Braclnjpliyllum. 



Genus ARAUCARITES, Presl. 



[Flor. Vorwelt, Fasc. vii. p. 203, 1838.] 



In the present instance this genus is used as a convenient 

 designation for certain female cones which resemble, in their 

 form and structure, those of the recent genus Araucaria. 



Araucarites (Conites), sp. Cf. Conites elegans (Carr.) 

 and Kaidocarpon minor, Carr. 



[PI. XII. Figs. 1 and 2.] 



It has already been pointed out that the specimen figured by 

 Carruthers as probably a male cone of Buclclandia has little or no 

 claim to be regarded as cycadean ; it very closely resembles the 

 specimens figured in PL XII. Figs. 1 and 2, and like them should 



