ECHINOIDEA. I. ., 



43 



found on the large pedicellariae; when this is the case, the spi- 

 cules (fenestrated plates) will show that it is no Dorocidaris) 3. 



3. The large globiferous pedicellarise with large nioutli ; the blade not 

 prolonged. The stalk has no limb of projecting calcareous ridges. 

 The small pedicellarias without end-tooth. The spicules fenestrated 



plates Stcreocidaris ingoljiana Mrtsn. 



The large globiferous pedicellariie with a little mouth at the 

 end of the somewhat prolonged blade. The stalk with a limb of 

 projecting calcareous ridges. The small globiferous pedicellariae 

 with end-tooth. The spicules spinous arcs Cidaris afjinis Phil. 



Fam. Echinothuridae. 



The classification of the Echinothurids is distinguished by a pleasing simplicity; only three 

 recent genera are known, Phorniosoma, Asthcnosoiiia and Spcrosoiiia^ and, what is still more pleasing, 

 there are only two synonyms of these names, viz. Calvcria W. Th., and Cyanosoma Sarasin. To the 

 genus Plwrniosovia 10 species have been referred, to AstJioiosovia 11, and to Sperosoma 2 species, most 

 of which species have been described by A. Agassiz, the rest by Wy v. Thomson, Koehler, Doder- 

 lein, and Yoshiwara, all during the last three decades. Here, then, we seem to have a division of 

 Echinids where the classification is in the best possible order. — The joy, unfortuuateh! docs not last 

 longer than until the moment when one has to determine Echinothurids oneself. Then one will soon 

 reecho the complaint of Sarasin: Wir wissen uicht, warum es A. Agassiz seinen Lesern so sehr 

 saner gemacht hat sich in seinen Challenger Echiniden zurecht zu finden. Um einen Echinothuriden 

 daraus zu bestimmen ist es notig die bei den einzelnen Arten gemachteu Angaben sorgfaltig zu ana- 

 lysieren, unter Rubriken zu ordnen und dann die Bestimmung zu versucheu> (352. p. 96). We might, 

 however, let that pass, if all the difficulties were to be superseded in this way; but this, unfortunately, 

 is not the case, as it will soon appear that the two large genera, Phoriitosonia and Asthenosoma ^ are 

 in reality not to be distinguished from each other with certainty. 



The chief difference between these genera is stated to be the fact that in Phormosoiiia the 

 plates overlap each other in the whole length of the edge, while in Asthcnosonia the plates are 

 narrower in the middle, so that naked interspaces are left ouh- covered by the skin; only the broader 

 ends of the plates overlap each other in the way peculiar for the Echinothurids. Now there i.s, 

 however, the drawback by this statement that the arrangement of the plates is generally only to be 

 seen in dried specimens. But the Echinothurids are only very little adapted for preservation in dried 

 state, and if the material in hand be slight, one does not like to destroy it for the sake of determina- 

 tion. And even if the material is copious enough, so that it is possible to examine the plates exactlj', 

 we are by no means sure to arrive at a result Bell (72) has shown that there is a considerable varia- 

 tion as to the size of the uncalcified membranous space between the plates : this may be quite conspi- 

 cuous or calcification may have gone so far, that it is difficult to detect the membranous interspace. — 



