Q. HYDROIDA II 



one in the median line near the base. The internodia of the hydrocladia have each a hydrotheca and 

 three sarcothecee, a supracalycine pair near the hydrotheca aperture and a median proximal of greatly 

 varying length. The proximal sarcotheca is tubulose, and ha.s an open connection with the lumen of 

 the hydrotheca; in the outer parts of the hydrocladium, it forms a more acute angle with the branch 

 axis than nearer the stem; its free parts are in forma fyptca up to 2/, the length of the hydrotheca, 

 in forma Billardi however, as a rule longer than the hydrotheca. The hydrotheca margin has an 

 abcauline tooth, and on either side, between this and the hydrocladium, three, or more rarely four 

 teeth. One or two internodial ribs are seen at the wall of the hydrotheca; at times an intrathecal 

 rib may be indicated. 



The gonothecse are situate on a hydrocladium which has broad lateral blades converging to 

 a corbula; the basal pair of blades is as a rule free, and hangs out and downwards; there is a hydro- 

 theca between the corbula and the stem. The gonothecse are pear-shaped. 



Material : 



"Thor", 35°57' N., 5°35' W., depth 740 metres. 



The synonymy of the species has been dealt with in detail on a previous occasion (Broch 

 1912 p. 8) and notice has also been taken of the variations. Geographicalh', Aglaophenia tubnlifera 

 is a southern species, only quite exceptionally i^assing beyond the limit of the boreal waters round 

 the British Isles; it belongs more especially to the middle and lower parts of the littoral region. 



Family series Sertulariina nov. 

 Family Sertulariidae. 



The hydrotheca; are bilateral in structure and furnished with closing apparatus formed of from 

 one to four jilates. The colonies form sympodia or monopodia with terminal growth point. The polyps 

 have a more or less pronounced abcauline and basal blind sack with a low, non-digestive endodernu^l 

 epithelium; they are therefore bilaterally symmetrical. 



Few families have been the subject of so much dispute as the Sertidan'ichr, both as regards 

 limitation and also in respect of division into genera. The best foundation is that given by Levin- 

 sen in his latest work (1913) where he comes to the same result as Stechow (1913). The latter 

 writer here separates off the Syiitlieciida- as a distinct family comprising those forms which lack the 

 lid; but while Levin sen also discards this group and refers it to the family Lafoeidce^ Stechow 

 considers the Synthrciidcr as an independent family, most nearly related to the Scrtulariidw sens. 

 strict — a view in which \vc may fully concur, owing to the homogeneous organisation of the polyps. 

 This principle for division is not very fully dealt with by Lev in sen, and in particular the special 

 organisation of the abcauline blind sack and its cndodermal peculiarities seem altogether to have 

 escaped his attention. This is suggested, as already mentioned, by his reference to a blind sack in 

 Liclorclla pinnala (G. O. .Sars) which from a purely anatomical point of view is hardly tenable. Com- 



