156 Darwin, and after Darivin. 



The criticism proceeds to show yet further inconsistencies 

 and self-contradictions in Mr. Wallace's treatment of this 

 subject; but it now seems needless to continue. Nor, 

 indeed, should I have quoted this much but for the sake 

 of so fully justifying my own criticism by showing the 

 endorsement which it has received from a completely in- 

 dependent examination. 



