54 ON NEW AND RARE ARACHNIDS. 



Dr. Jackson gives a detailed description of this spider (I.e. 

 supra). I would only add to it that in the two small denti- 

 cular processes on the face of the maxilla? there is a 

 remarkable resemblance to the genus Haplinis, Simon 

 (Historic Naturelles des Araignees, Vol. I., p. 700) ; of this 

 genus I have the male of an undescribed species in 

 my possession from the Falkland Islands, which has been 

 examined and determined by M. Simon. The type of the 

 genus Haplinis (female only) hails from New Zealand. The 

 female also of G. blandum, Sim., appears to have these 

 small denticles on the maxilla?, but they are much more 

 minute than in the male ; whether they are really of 

 generic importance or not seems to me rather uncertain. 

 M. Simon appears to have quite overlooked them in his 

 description (Arachnides de France, torn. V., p. 604). 

 The only female I have seen of G. blandum is smaller than the 

 male, but this is not, I think, a very material point. 



Dr. Jackson has met with several examples of both sexes of 

 this very interesting spider on the Banks of the Dee in 

 Cheshire (at Queensferry), under stones covered with sea 

 water at the spring tides. It had not been before recorded as 

 British-. 



CORRECTION OF PAPER IN PROC. DORSET FIELD 

 CLUB, VOL. XXXI., 1910. 



Page 51 At top of page, for incisa, read recisa. 



52 At bottom of page, for Tmeticus, read Centromerus ; 



and for 195, read 174. 

 ,, 58 Line 11 from top, for or read of. 

 60 At bottom of page, for Sub. -Family Epeiridce, read 



Epeirinae. 

 65 Near top of page, for incisa, read recisa. 



