BOWMAN LECTUKE. 



CLXXIII 



I, 1 and 2, no information. II, 2 to 6, their issue. II, 2 had bad sight 

 and married a first cousin with bad sight, but no particulars of the dis- 

 ease or of kind of cousinship, nor of sight of their 12 children (III, 1). 

 II, 3 had 10 children, of whom a son and daughter (III, 2 and 3) had 

 some defect of sight, but no details. II, 4 also some unknown affection 



of sight ; II, 5 affected at 14, and went to Moorfields then ; living, aet. 61, 

 in 1891, sight not improved ; II, 6 living, with good sight. Ill, 5 (Mrs. 

 Pitt) failed at 30, married at 18, no children ; III, 8 (Mrs. Barrett) failed 

 at 20, has had children, too young to show the disease (IV, 1 and 2j ; 

 III, 9 (Lynham) failed at about 22, seen nine months later ; III, 10 

 (Wilson) failed at 22i after influenza, seen six months later; III, 12 

 (fifth born), fits. 



1895. Case 141. E. N., unpublished, St. Thomas's Hospital, 1885 and 

 1893. (Donovan.) 



I, 1 and 2 had good eyes. II, 1, Hodgkins, of Birmingham, had a son 

 (III, 1) affected at about 40; 11,3 married Jones and had son (III, 3) 

 affected so early that he never learned to read, set. 30 years in 1893 ; II, 4 

 married Donovan II, 5 and had issue. Ill, 4 ( J. Donovan) affected at 30, 

 seen at 30 and again at 43 ; III, 5 (Mrs. Leonard) married at 22, affected 

 at 33, and seen soon after ; III, 8, 10 who died quite young. IV, 1 

 affected in early life, could never see his work properly ; IV, 2, five 

 children of III, 4, two dying early ; IV, 3, four children of III, 5, two 

 dying early. 



1895. Case 142. E. N., unpublished, Moorfields Hospital, 1896. 

 (Laxford.) 



I, 1 believed to have had bad sight ; had two sons undoubtedly affected 

 like the rest (II, 1 and 2) ; I, 2 certainly affected ; had one normal 

 daughter (II, 3) with normal children (III, 1, 2, and 3), one affected 

 daughter (II, 4) and two affected sons (II, 5 and 0) ; no record of other 



