22 BOOK OF THE DAMNED 



Or snowflakes. Size of saucers. Said to have fallen at Nashville, 

 Tenn., Jan. 24, 1891. One smiles. 



"In Montana, in the winter of 1887, fell snowflakes 15 inches 

 across, and 8 inches thick." (Monthly Weather Review, 1915-73.) 



In the topography of intellection, I should say that what we call 

 knowledge is ignorance surrounded by laughter. 



Black rains red rains the fall of a thousand tons of butter. 

 Jet-black snow pink snow blue hailstones hailstones flavored 

 like oranges. 

 Punk and silk and charcoal. 



About one hundred years ago, if anyone was so credulous as to 

 think that stones had ever fallen from the sky, he was reasoned 

 with: 



In the first place there are no stones in the sky: 



Therefore no stones can fall from the sky. 



Or nothing more reasonable or scientific or logical than that could 

 be said upon any subject. The only trouble is the universal trouble: 

 that the major premise is not real, or is intermediate somewhere be- 

 tween realness and unrealness. 



In 1772, a committee, of whom Lavoisier was a member, was 

 appointed by the French Academy, to investigate a report that a 

 stone had fallen from the sky at Luce, France. Of all attempts at 

 positiveness, in its aspect of isolation, I don't know of anything 

 that has been fought harder for than the notion of this earth's 

 unrelatedness. Lavoisier analyzed the stone of Luce. The exclu- 

 sionists' explanation at that time was that stones do not fall from 

 the sky: that luminous objects may seem to fall, and that hot 

 stones may be picked up where a luminous object seemingly had 

 landed only lightning striking a stone, heating, even melting it. 



The stone of Luce showed signs of fusion. 



Lavoisier's analysis "absolutely proved" that this stone had not 

 fallen: that it had been struck by lightning. 



So, authoritatively, falling stones were damned. The stock 

 means of exclusion remained the explanation of lightning that was 

 seen to strike something that had been upon the ground in the 

 first place. 



But positiveness and the fate of every positive statement. It i> 

 not customary to think of damned stones raising an outcry against 



