BOOK OF THE DAMNED 



they are the impressions of claws of large birds driven ashore by 

 stress of weather. On more than one occasion reports have been 

 circulated that an animal from a menagerie had been caught, but 

 the matter at present is as much involved in mystery as ever it 

 was." 



In the Illustrated London News, the occurrence is given a great 

 deal of space. In the issue of Feb. 24, 1855, a sketch is given of 

 the prints. 



I call them cones in incomplete basins. 



Except that they're a little longish, they look like prints of hoofs 

 of horses or, rather, of colts. 



But they're in a single line. 



It is said that the marks from which the sketch was made were 8 

 inches apart, and that this spacing was regular and invariable "in 

 every parish." Also other towns besides those named in the Times 

 are mentioned. The writer, who had spent a winter in Canada, and 

 was familiar with tracks in snow, says that he had never seen "a 

 more clearly defined track." Also he brings out the point that was 

 so persistently disregarded by Prof. Owen and the other correlators 

 . that "no known animal walks in a line of single footsteps, not 

 even man." With these wider inclusions, this writer concludes with 

 us that the marks were not footprints. It may be that his follow- 

 ing observation hits upon the crux of the whole occurrence: 



That whatever it may have been that had made the marks, it 

 had removed, rather than pressed, the snow. 



According to his observations the snow looked "as if branded 

 with a hot iron." 



Illustrated London News, March 3, 1855-214: 



Prof. Owen, to whom a friend had sent drawings of the prints, 

 writes that there were claw-marks. He says that the "track" was 

 made by "a" badger. 



Six other witnesses sent letters to this number of the News. 

 One mentioned, but not published, is a notion of a strayed swan. 

 Always this homogeneous-seeing "a" badger "a" swan "a v 

 track. I should have listed the other towns as well as those men- 

 tioned in the Times. 



A letter from Mr. Musgrave is published. He, too, sends a 

 sketch of the prints. It, too, shows a single line. There are four 

 prints, of which the third is a little out of line. 



There is no sign of a claw-mark. 



The prints look like prints of longish hoofs of a very young colt, 



