38 LEGAL WASTE OF TIMBER 



or for years has no right to cut for sale 1 either timber 

 trees or those fit only for firewood, nor to exchange the 

 same either for fuel 2 or for materials for repairs; 3 and 

 some courts have declined to accept as a justification for 

 such exchange the proffered showing of the tenant that he 

 procured fuel or repair timber elsewhere and that he took 

 no more from the premises than was allowable. 4 On the 

 other hand it has been held in some jurisdictions that a 



1. Ala. Ladd v. Shattuck, 90 Ala. 134, 7 So. 764. 



Ark. Rutherford v. Wilson, (1910) 129 S. W. 534; McLeod v. Dial, 63 Ark. 10. 



37 S. W. 306. 



Del. Fleming v. Collings, 2 Del. Oh. 230. 

 'Ga. Smith v. Smith. 105 Ga. 106, 31 S. E. 135; Jones v. Gammon, 12','. Ga. 47, 50 



S. E. 982. 



Ind. Miller v. Shields, 55 Ind. 71 ; Modlin v. Kennedy, 53 Ind. 267. 

 Ky. Loudon v. Warfleld, 5 J. J. Marsh 196; Brashear v. Macey. 3 J. J. Marsh 93. 

 Mass. Padelford v. Padelford, 24 Mass. (7 Pick.) 151; Noyes v. Stone, 163 Mass. 



400, 40 N. E. 856. 



Me. Babb v. Periey, 1 Me. 6; Richardson v. York, 1 Me. 21<>. 

 JVIich. Duncombe v. Felt, SI Mich, 332, 45 N. W. 1004: Webster v. Peel, 97 Mich. 



326. 

 .Miss. Moss Point Lumber Co. v. Harrison Co., 89 Miss. 448. 42 So. 290. 873; 



Warren Co. v. Gans, 80 Miss. 76, 31 So. 539; Learned v. Ogd 'n, 80 Miss. 



769, 32 So. 278, 92 Am. St. Rep. 621. 



Mo. Profltt v. Henderson, 29 Mo. 325; Davis v. Clark. 40 Mo. A pp. 515. 

 X. H. Chase v. Hazelton, 7 N. H. 171; Fuller v. Wason, 7 N. H. 341; Webster v. 



W. -b^ter, 33 N. H. 18, 60 Am. Dec. 705; Johnson v. Johnson, 18 N. H. 



594. 

 TT. J. Morehouse v. Cotheal, 22 N. J. L. 521; Van Syckel v. Emery, 18 X. J. Eq. 



387. 

 N. Y. Robinson v. Kinne, 70 N. Y. 147; Kidd v. Dennison, 6 Barb. 9; Weatherby 



v. Wood, 29 How. Pr. 404; Sarles v. Sarles, 3 Sandf. Ch. 601 ; Van Deusen 



v. Young, 29 N. Y. 9; Clarke v. Cummings, 5 Barb. 339; Schermerhorn 



v. Buell, 4 Denio 422; Mooers v. Wait, 3 Wend. 104, 20 Am. Dec. 667; 



People v. Davidson, 4 Barb. 109. 

 IN. C. Ward v. Sheppard, 3 N. C. 283, 2 Am. Dec. 625; Parkins v. Cox, 3 N. C. 



339; Davis v. Gilliam, 40 N. C. (5 Ired. Eq.) 308; Dorsey v. Moore, 100 



N. C. 41, 6 S. E. 270; Jones v. Britton, 102 N. C. 166, 9 S. E. 554, 4 



L. R. A. 178. 



Ohio. Crockett v. Crockett, 2 Ohio St. 180. 

 Pa. Glass v. Glass, 6 Pa. Co. Ct. 463. 

 R. I. Clemence v. Steere, 1 R. I. 272, 53 Am. Dec. 621; Lester v. Young. 14 R. I. 



579. 



S. C. Hill v. Burgess, 37 S. C. 604, 15 S. E. 963. 

 Texas Johnson v. Gurley, 52 Tex. 222. 



U. S. Thurston v. Muston, 23 Fed. Cas. No. 14,013. 3 Cranch. C. C. 335. 

 Can. Titus v. Sulis, 3 Nova Scotia Dec. 497; Lewis v. Godson, 15 Ont. 252; 



Tayler v. Tayler. 5 U. C. Q. B. O. S. 501. 

 Eng. Raymond v. Fitch, 2 C. M. & R. 588, 1 Yale 337, 5 L. J. Exch. 45. 5 Tyrw. 



985; Goulin v. Caldwell, 13 Grant Ch. (U. C.) 493. 

 See 33 Cent. Dig. title, Life Estates, Sec. 42; and 48 Cent. Dig., title, Waste, 



Sees. 12 and 13. 



2. Padelford v. Padelford, 7 Pick. (Mass.) 152; Hogan v. Hogan, 102 Mich. 641, 61 



N. W. 73; Miles v. Miles, 32 N. H. 147. 



3. Dennett v. Dennett, 43 N. H. 499; Elliott v. Smith, 2 N. H. 430; Miller v. Shields, 



55 Ind. 71; Kidd v. Dennison, 6 Barb. (N. Y.) 9. 



4. Clarke v. Cummings, 5 Barb. (N. Y.) 339 (Character of wood may have been a 



factor.) Morehouse v. Cotheal, 22 N. J. L. 521; Gorges v. Stanfleld, Cro. Eliz. 

 593, 78 Eng. Reprint 836; Contra, Phillips v. Allen, 7 Allen (Mass.) 115. 



