MEASURE OF DAMAGES 75 



formed a wind break, ' shade trees,' 2 and in other cases where 

 the value of the trees after severance was not equivalent 

 to the damage done. If the trees cut by a trespasser are 

 also carried away by him the action for redress should 

 in most instances be brought in replevin or trover. 



75. The Highest Measure of Damages Allowed. It 



appears to be the general policy of all courts to allow 

 the party injured to bring action in such form and to recover 

 damages upon such basis as will afford him full compen- 

 sation for the injury, and to permit him to recover either 

 the value of the timber :! or the depreciation of the 



(Footnote / concluded from preceding page) 



St. Louis & S. F. Ry. v. Hoover, :i Kun. App. . r >77, 4.'5 Par. So! (fire.) (rea- 

 sonably prudent operation of engine required.) 

 Atchison T. & S. F. Ry. v. Geiser OS Kan. 2X1, 75 Pac. OS. 



Mo. Doty v. Quincy, (.). it K. C. K. R.. 1:50 Mo. App. 254, 110 S. \V. 1 120 (lire). 

 X. H. Foote v. Merrill, 54 X. If. 490, 20 Am. Hep. 151. 

 X. V. Dwitfht v. Klniira Ktc. R. Co. 1:52 X. V. 100. :!() X. K. :50X, 2S Am. St. Rep. 



/>(;.}. 15 L. K. A. 012: Carter v. Pitelier S7 Hun 5<s(), 24 X. V. Suppl. 549. 

 Tex. ddvestou Ktc. R. Co. v. \Varneeke, i:i Tex. Civ. App. s:j. 1)5 S. \V. 000. 



1. Xi\o'i v. Stihvell, 52 I fun. (X. Y.) .S53.5 X. Y. Suppl. 24x. 



2. C,;,m. Eldridjw v. (iorman, 77 Conn. 000, 00 All. 04:5.; Ifoyt v. Southern New E. 



Tel. Co. 00 Conn. :5S5. 22 All. 957. 



Del. Jordan v. Delaware it A. T. Co. 75 All. 1014 (1909). 



Ind. Delaware & M. C. T. Co. v. Fisk, 40 Ind. App. :US, SI X. K. 1 100 (1907). 

 Iowa. Meyer v. Standard Tel. Co. 122 la. 514, Ox X*. \V. .'{()<) (exceeded license.) 

 Kan. Wichita (I. 1':. L. & P. Co. v. Wright 9 Kan. App. 7:iO, 59 Pac. IOS5 (Gas). 

 I.a. Tissot v. dvat S. T. & T. Co., :{0 La. Ann. 900, :{ So. 201. 

 Me. Longfellow v. Quimby, : Me. 457. 



Mass. Piiikerton v. Randolph, 200 Mass. 24, S5 X. F. X02. (In street). 

 X. Y. Fdsall v. llowell SO Hun. 424, : X. Y. Suppl. X02; (ioriiam v. Fast- 



chester Fl. Co. SO Hun 290, :) X. Y. Suppl. 125 (1S04); Xixon v. Stil- 



well 52 Hun. :i5:{, 5 X. Y. Suppl. IMS; Ferguson v. Huckell, 101 App. Div. 



2l:i, 01 X. Y. Suppl. 724 (Trees about summer home.) 

 X. D. Cleveland School Dist. v. (it, Northern Ry., 20 X. Dak. 124, 120 X. W. 



005; 2S L. R. A. (X. S.) 757. 

 :i. Cal. Cleland v. Thornton, 4:5 Cal. 4:57. 



(ia. AVestern & A. R. R. v. Tate, 120 (!a. 52C>, 50 S. F. 200: Smit h v. (ionder. 22 



(ia, :i.5:5. 



111. liirket \-. \\'illia,nis, :i() 111. App. 452. (Trees in nursery). 

 Ind. H aisled v. Siller:?;") Ind. App. 410, 71 N. K. 257. 

 Iowa. Leiber v. Chi. M. \ St. P. Ky. SI la. 07. 50 N.W. 547. (ireenfield v. Chicago 



Ftc. R. Co. S3 Iowa 270; 40 X. \V. 05: (Iraessle v. C'arpenter 70 la. 100. 



Freeland v. Muscatine, Iowa 401; Krejci v. Chi. etc. R. Co. 117 la, 



.'544, 00 N. \V. 70S. 



Kan. Missouri, K & T. Ry. v. Steinheriier. C. Kan. App. 5X5. 51 I'ac. 02S. Mis- 

 souri, K \ T. Ry. v. Lycan 57 Kan. 0^5, 47 Pac. 520. Atchison, Ftc. R. 



Co. v. Hamilton, (i Kan. App. 447; 50 Pac. 102; Atcli. etc. R. Co. v. Finer- 

 son, 50 Pac. 70. 

 Ky. Lindsay v. Latham 107 S. \V. 207, :?2 Ky. L. Rep. S07 : Louisville it X. 



R. R. v. Heeler 120 Ky. :{2S, 10:i S. \\ . :{()(), M L. R. A (X. S.) <:{(); 



Median v. Edwards 02 Ky. 574, IS S. \V. 510. 

 La. dial-anted V. it S. D. Co. v. llolscll. 107 La, 715, :( 1 So. 000. Stoner v. 



Tex. & Pac. Ry. 45 I.a. Ann. 1 15. 1 I So. X75. 

 Ma,ss. Cults v. Spring !5 Mass. 11)5 (1S1X); Hliss v. Hall 00 Mass. 507. 07 Am. 



Dec. 5X. 



(Footnote ,'5 continued on next page,) 



