140 CONTRACTS REGARDING GROWING TIMBER 



which require that all conveyances of realty shall be under 

 seal, it is necessary that a transfer of property in standing 

 timber be effected by a sealed instrument. x It is also the 



(Footnote 4 concluded from preceding page) 



Ga. Coody v. Gross Lbr. Co., 82 Ga. 793. 



Ind. Spacy v. Evans, 152 Ind. 431; Hostetter v. Auman, 119 Ind. 7; Cool v. 

 Peters Box etc. Co., 87 Ind. 531; Armstrong v. Lawson, 73 Ind. 498; 

 Owens v. Lewis, 46 Ind. 488, 15 Am. Rep. 295. 



Iowa Garner v. Mahoney, 115 Iowa 356, 88 N. W. 828; Sanders v. Clark, 22 

 Iowa 275. 



Kan. Powers v. Clarkson, 17 Kan. 218. 



La. Kemper v. Lumber Co., 134 La. 816, 64 So. 760. 



Mich. Williams v. Hyde, 98 Mich. 152; White v. King, 87 Mich. 107; 49 N. W. 

 518; See Clifton v. Jackson Iron Co., 74 Mich 183; Spalding v. Archi- 

 bald, 52 Mich. 365, 50 Am. Rep. 253 ; Wetmore v. Neuberger, 44 Mich. 

 362; Johnson v. Moore, 28 Mich. 3; Greeley v. Stilson, 27 Mich. 153. 



Minn. Kileen v. Kennedy, 90 Minn. 414, 97 N. W. 126; Kirkeby v. Erickson, 90 

 Minn. 299, 96 N. W. 705, 101 Am. St. Rep. 411; Herrick v. Newell, 49 

 Minn. 198. 



Miss. Walton v. Lowrey, 74 Miss. 484, 21 So. 243; Harrell v. Miller, 35 Miss. 700, 

 72 Am. Dec. 154; But see, Lee v. Hawks, 68 Miss. 669, 9 So. 828, 13 

 L. R. A. 633. 



Mo. Alt v. Grosclose, 61 Mo. App. 409; Cooley v. Kansas City etc. R. Co., 149 

 Mo. 487. 



N. H. Reid v. McQuesten, 61 N. H. 421; Howe v. Batehelder, 49 N. H. 204; 

 Kingsley v. Holbrook, 45 N. H. 313, 86 Am. Dec. 173; Ockington v. 

 Richey, 41 N. H. 275; Olmstead v. Niles, 7 N. H. 522; Putney v. Day, 6 

 N. H. 430, 25 Am. Dec. 470. 



N. J. Slocum v. Seymour, 36 N. J. Law 138, 13 Am. Rep. 432 ; See Hendrickson 

 v. Ivins, Saxton 562. 



N. Y. Thompson v. Poor, 57 Hun. 285; Boyce v. Washburn, 4 Hun. 792; Wood v. 

 Shults, 4 Hun. 309, 6 Thompjs. & C. 557; Goodyear v. Vosburgh, 57 

 Barb. 243; Vorebeck v. Roe, 50 Barb. 302; Bennett v. Scutt, 18 Barb. 

 347; Warren v. Leland, 2 Barb. 613; McGregor v. Brown, 6 Seld. (10 

 N. Y.) 114; Green v. Armstrong, 1 Denio 550; Mumford v. Whitney, 15 

 Wend. 380; Dubois v. Kelly, 10 Wend. 496; Pierrepont v. Barnard, 5 

 Wend. 364; Van Pelt v. McGraw, 4 N. Y. 110; VanElstyne v. Wimple, 

 5 Cow. 162. 



N. C. Drake v. Howell, 133 N. C. 162, 45 S. E. 539; Green v. North Carolina R. 

 Co., 73 N. C. 524; Cf. Moring v. Ward, 5 Jones L. (50 N. C.) 252. 



Ohio Hirth v. Graham, 50 Ohio St. 57, 33 N. E. 90, 40 Am. St. Rep. 641, 19 



L. R. A. 721. 



v Tenn. Galloway & Pearse Co. v. Sabin, 130 Tenn. 575, 172 S. W. 292; Knox v. 

 Haralson, 2 Tenn. Ch. 232. 



Tex. Gulf etc. R. Co. v. Foster (Tex. Civ. App. 1898), 44 S. W. 198. 



Vt. Buck v. Pickwell, 27 Vt. 158; But see, Sterling v. Baldwin, 42 Vt. 306; 

 Yale v. Seely, 15 Vt. 221; Ellison v. Brigham, 38 Vt. 64. 



Va. Smith v. Ramsey, 116 Va. 530. 82 S. E. 189; Stuart v. Pennis, 91 Va. 688. 



Wis. Bruley v. Garvin, 105 Wis. 625; Lillie v. Dunbar, 62 Wis. 198; Daniels v. 

 Bailey, 43 Wis. 566; Strasson v. Montgomery, 32 Wis. 52. 



Can. Summers v. Cook, 28 Grant (Ont.) 179; MacDonnell v. McKay, 15 Grant 

 (Ont.) 391; Kerr v. Connell, Berton, (N.Brunsw.) 151; Murray v. Gil- 

 bert, 1 Hannay (N. Brunsw.) 548; New Brunswick Land Co. v. Kirk. 1 

 Allen (N. Brunsw.) 443; Seegee v. Perley, 1 Kerr (N. Brunsw.)439; 

 McCarty v. Oliver, 14 U. C. C. P. 290; But see, Mclntosh v. McLeod, 18 

 Nova Scotia 128. 6 Can. L. T. 449. 



Eng. Scorell v. Boxwell, 1 Y. & Jerv. 396; Teal v. Auty, 2 B. & B. 101 ; Hewitt v. 



Isham, 7 Exch. 77. 



1. Turpentine Co. v. Armstrong, 10 Ga. App. 339, 73 G. E. 610; Emerson v. 

 Shores. 95 Me. 237, 49 Atl. 1051, 85 Am. St. Rep. 404; White v. King, 87 

 Mich. 107, 49 N. W. 518; Potter v. Everett, 40 Mo. App. 152; Andrews v. 

 Costican, 30 Mo. App. 29; Goodyear v. Vosburgh, 57 Barb. (N. Y.) 243: Vore- 

 beck v. Roe, 50 Barb. (N. Y.) 302; Mclntyre v. Barnard, 1 Sandf. Ch. (N. Y.) 

 52; See also, Fish v. Capwell (R. I.), 29 Atl. 840, 25 L. R. A. 159 Inst. not 

 ack. or recorded; Contra, Warren v. Leland, 2 Barb. (N. Y.) 613. 



