TIME FOR REMOVAL OF TIMBER SOLD 147 



reasonable time. 1 And if the contract does not expressly 

 indicate that there is to be no limit, 2 and yet fails to desig- 

 nate a limited time for removal, the courts will allow only a 

 reasonable time for the removal. 3 The court will ordinarily 

 leave to the jury the determination of what constitutes a 



1. Hawkins v. Goldsboro Lumber Co., 139 N. C. 160, 51 S. E. 852, 139 N. C. 167, 51 



8. E. 855. Gay Mfg. Co. v. Hobbs. 128 N. C. 46, 38 S. E. 26, 83 Am. St. Rep. 

 661. 



2. Fla. See Cawthorn v. Lbr. Co., 60 Fla. 313, 53 So. 738. 



Ga. North Ga. Co. v. Bebee, 128 Ga. 563, 57 S. E. 873; Baxter v. Mattox, 106 



Ga. 344, 32 S. E. 94. 

 Ky. McCoy v. Fraley, 113 S. W. 444. 

 La. Lbr. Co. v. Hotard, 122 La. 850, 48 So. 286. 

 Miss. Lbr. Co. v. Britton, 105 Miss. 592, 62 So. 648; Lbr. Co. v. Guy, 92 Miss. 



361, 46 So. 78. 



Mont. Realty Co. v. Donlan, 149 Pac. 484. * 



S. C. Orchard Co. v. Dennis, 220 Fed. 516 (unconditional conveyance, grantee 



has indefinite time to remove.) 

 Tex. Jones v. Lbr. Co. (Civ. App.) 99 S. W. 736; Lbr. Co. v. Taylor, 100 Tex. 



270, 98 S. W. 238; Lbr. Co. v. Taylor (Civ. App.) 99 S. W. 192. 

 Va. Brown v. Lbr. Co. 75 S. E. 84; Young v. Mfg. Co., 110 Va. 678, 66 S. E. 



843; See Carpenter v. Mfg. Co., 71 S. E. 559. 

 Wash. Boom Co. v. Ydumans, 116 Pac. 645. 



3. Ala. Ward v. Moore, 180 Ala. 403, 61 So. 303; Goodson v. Stewart. 154 Ala. 



660, 46 So. 239; Heflin v. Bingham, 56 Ala. 566, 28 Am. Rep. 776. 



Ark. Yelvington v. Short, 111 Ark. 253, 163 S. W. 522; Earl v. Harris, 137 

 S. W. 806; Fletcher v. Lyon, 93 Ark. 5, 123 S. W. 801; Listen v. Chap- 

 man Etc. Lbr. Co., (1905) 91 S. W. 27. 



Fla. Cawthorn v. Lbr. Co., 60 Fla. 313, 53 So. 738; Land Co. v. Adams, 54 Fla. 

 550, 45 S. E. 492. 



Ga. Howell v. Clements, 139 Ga. 441, 77 S. E. 564; Turpentine Co. v. Arm- 

 strong 10 Ga. App. 339, 73 S. E. 610; Lbr. Co. v. Gates, 70 S. E. 672; 

 Johnson v. Truitt, 122 Ga. 327, 50 S. E . 135. See also McRae v. Still- 

 well, 111 Ga. 65. 36 S. E. 604, 55 L. R. A. 513; Goette v. Lane, 111 Ga. 

 400. 



See Brand v. Johnson, (Ga. App.) 71 S. E. 1123. 



Iowa Cf. Baker v. Kenney, 145 la. 638, 124 N. W. 901 (Perpetual right of entry.) 

 ' Ky. Dev. Co. v. Lbr. Co., 154 Ky. 523, 157 S. W. 1109; Hicks v. Phillips, 146 

 Ky. 305, 142 S. W. 394; Gates v. Yeargin, 115 S. W. 794; Evans v. 

 Dobbs, 112 S. W. 667; Timber Co v. Coal Co., 107 S. W. 733, 32 Ky. L. 

 Rep. 1015; Bowerman v. Taylor, 127 Ky. 812, 106 S. W. 846, 32 Ky. L. 

 Rep. 671; Cf. Siler v. Property Co., 107 S. W. 266. 32 Ky. L. Rep. 911. 



La. See Shepherd v. Lbr. Co. 121 La. 1011, 46 So. 999. 



Mich. St. James v. Erskine, 155 Mich. 606, 119 N. W. 897. 



Miss. Hall v. Eastman, 89 Miss. 588, 43 So. 2. 



N. H. Kidder v. Flanders, 73 N. H. 345, 61 Atl. 675; Hoit v. Stratton Mills, 54 

 N. H. 109, 20 Am. Rep. 119. 



N. C. See Hornthal v. Howcott, 154 N. C. 228, 70 S. E. 171 ; Bunch v. Elizabeth 

 City Lumber Co., 134 N. C. 116, 46 S. E. 24. 



Pa. Patterson v. Graham, 164 Pa. St. 234, 30 Atl. 247. 



S. C. Gray v. Lbr. Co., 86 S. E. 640; Minshaw v. Lbr. Corp., 98 S. C. 8, 81 S. E. 

 1027; Timber Co. v. Prettyman, 97 S. C. 247, 81 S. E. 484; Gresham v. 

 Lbr. Corp., 96 S. C. 53, 79 S. E. 799. 



Tenn. Carson v. Three States Lbr. Co., 108 Tenn. 681, 69 S. W. 320, 91 S. W. 53. 



Tex. Oil Co. v. Hamilton (Civ. App.) 153 S. W. 1194; Oil Co. v. Boykin (Civ. 

 App.) 153 S. W. 1176, Development Co. v. Lbr. Co. (Civ. App.) 139 S. 

 W. 1015; Beauchamp v. Williams (Civ. App.) 115 S. W. 130. 



Vt. Lbr. Co. v. Lyman, 94 Atl. 837. 



Va. Carpenter v. Mfg. Co., 71 S. E. 559. 



W.Va. Metallurgical Co. v. Montgomery, 74 S. E. 994. 



Can. Dolan v. Baker, 10 Ont. L. Rep. 259. 



