212 THE FLOTATION OF TIMBER 



that is capable of floating logs only during short periods of 



(Footnote 4 concluded from preceding page) 



Me. 9, 50 Am. Dec. 641; Wadsworth v. Smith. 11 Me. 278, 26 Am. 



Dec. 525; Spring v. Russell, 7 Me. 273; Berry v. Carle, 3 Me. 269. 

 Mass. French v. Conn. River Lbr. Co., 145 Mass. 261. 

 Mich. McDonnell v. Rifle Boom Co., 71 Mich. 61; Butterfield v. Gilchrist, 



53 Mich. 22; Thunder Bay River Booming Co. v. Speechly, 31 Mich. 

 336, 18 Am. Rep. 184; Middleton v. Flat River Booming Co. 27 Mich. 

 533; Moore v. Sanborne, 2 Mich. 519, 59 Am. Dec. 209. But see 

 Bellows v. Lumber Co. (Mich.) 85 N. W. 1103 (Driving hardwood 

 may be unreasonable use) 



Minn. Doucette v. Little Falls Imp. Co., 71 Minn. 206. 



Miss. Cue v. Breland, 78 Miss. 864, 29 So. 850. 



Mo. McKinney v. Northcut, 114 Mo. App. 146, 89 S. W. 351. 



Nev. Mandlebaum v. Russell, 4 Nev. 551. 



N. H. Connecticut River Lbr. Co. v Olcott Falls Co., 65 N. H., 290, 21 Atl. 

 1090, 13 L. R. A. 826; Collins v. Howard, 65 N. H., 190, 18 Atl. 794; 

 Carter v. Thurston, 58 N. H., 104, 42 Am. Rep. 584; Thompson v. 

 Androscoggin River Imp. Co. 54 N. H. 545. Scott v. Wilson, 3 N. H. 

 321, 325. 



N. Y. Brewster v. Rogers 169 N. Y., 73, 62 N. E. 164, 58 L. R. A. 495, 42 

 App. Div. 343, 59 N. Y. Suppl. 32. 



Pierrepont v. Loveless, 72 N. Y. 211; Morgan v. King, 18 Barb. 277 

 35 N. Y., 454, 91 Am. Dec. 58; DeCamp v. Thompson, 16 N. Y. 

 App. Div. 528, 44 N. Y. Suppl. 1014; Canal Fund Com'r's v. Kemp- 

 shall, 26 Wend. 404; Shaw v. Crawford, 10 Johns, 236. 

 See Curtis v. Keesler, 14 Barb. 511; Browne v. Schofleld, 8 Barb. 

 239; Munsonv. Hungerford, 6 Barb. 265; DeCamp v. Bullard (N. Y.) 



54 N. E. 26. 



N. C. Burke County v. Catawba Lbr. Co., 116 N. C., 731,, 21 S. E. 941, 47 

 Am. St. Rep. 829, 115 N. C. 590, 20 S. E. 707, 847. 



Ore. Kiiiiuii v. Normand, 50 Ore. 9, 91 Pac. 448, 126 Am. St. Rep. 698, 11 

 L. R. A. N. S. 290; Hunter v. Grande Ronde Lbr. Co., (1901) 65 Pac. 

 598; Hallock v. Suitor, 37 Ore. 9, 60 Pac. 384; 1 1 nines v. Hall, 17 Ore. 

 165, 20 Pac. 831, 3 L. R. A. 609; Shaw v. Oswego Iron Co., 10 Ore. 

 371, 45 Am. Rep. 146; Felger v. Robinson, 3 Ore. 455; Weise v. Smith 

 3 Ore. 445, 8 Am. Rep. 621. Cf. Hood River Lumbering Co. v. Wasco 

 County, 57 Pac. 1017 (Act. 1889 unconstitutional) 



Penn. White Deer Creek Imp. Co. v. Sassaman, 67 Pa. St. 415; Baker v. Lewis 

 33 Pa. St. 301, 75 Am. Dec. 598; Deddrick v. Wood, 15 Pa. St. 9. 



Tenn. Stuart v. Clark, 2 Swan 9, 58 Am. Dec. 49; But see Irwin v. Brown (1889) 

 12 S. W. 340; Stump v. McNairy, 5 Hump. 363, 42 Am. Dec. 437. 



Wash. Shingle Co. v. Skagland, 77 Wash. 8, 137 Pac. 304. Lbr. Co. v. Power 

 Co., 72 Wash. 631, 131 Pac. 220; State v. Super. Ct. 60 Wash. 193. 

 110 Pac. 1017; Monroe Mill Co. v. Menzel, 35 Wash. 487, 77 Pac. 

 813, 102 Am. St. Rep. 905, 70 L. R. A. 272; Watkins v. Dorris, 24 

 Wash. 636, 64 Pac. 840, 54 L. R. A. 199. 



W. Va. Gaston v. Mace, 33 W. Va. 14, 10 S. E. 60, 25 Am. St. Rep. 848, 5 

 L. R. A. 392. 



Wis. Bloomer v. Bloomer, 128 Wis. 297, 107 N. W. 974; in re Power Co., 

 140 Wis. 245, 122 N. W. 801. Falls. Mfg. Co. v. Oconto River Imp. 

 Co., 87 Wis. 134, 58 N. W. 257 Stevens Point Room Co. v. Reilly. 

 44 Wis. 295; 49 N. W. 978; Olson v. Merrill, 42 Wis. 203; See Sheldon 

 v. Rockwell, 9 Wis. 166, 76 Am. Dec. 265. Sellers v. Union Lum- 

 bering Co., 39 Wis. 525; Whisler v. Wilkinson, 22 Wis. 572. Cf. 

 Allaby v. Service Co. 135 Wis. 345, 116 N. W. 4, 16 L. R. A. N. 

 S. 420. 



TJ. S. U. S. v. Marthinson, 58 Fed. 765; U. S. v. Burns, 54 Fed. 351; Heer- 

 man v. Beef Slough Mfg. Etc. Co. 1 Fed. 145, 8 Biss. 334; U. S. v. 

 Miss. River Boom Co., 1 McCrary, 601. 



Canada: Rowe v. Titus, 6 N. Brunswick 326; Esson v. McMaster, 3 N. Bruns- 

 wick 501. Ward v. Grenville, 32 Can. S. Ct., 510. 

 But see Nardini v. Reid, 6 Newfd. 134. 



