A HISTORY OF NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 



instance in the (lost) manor of ' Celverdescote,' which in Domesday is 

 a single whole, but in this Survey is divided between three Hundreds. 



A careful student of this Survey has suggested to me that the 

 proportion of its 'small virgate ' to the Marge' or Domesday virgate can 

 be traced in certain other Hundreds as well as in these in which the 

 proportion was 5 to 2 as explained above (p. 358), in consequence 

 of their assessment having been reduced 60 per cent. In ' Stotfolde ' 

 Hundred for instance, the ' small virgate ' seems to be ^^ hide at Maid- 

 well (though it is, strangely enough, j^ hide at Clipston), and in 

 Wimersley Hundred it is 1^ hide at Horton. But we nowhere find 

 such clear evidence as in those Hundreds where the ' small virgate ' 

 was ^ hide, that is, in the proportion of 5 to 2 to the ' large virgate ' 

 (i hide). 



It may be convenient to append the order in which the Survey 

 enters the Hundreds : Hokeslawe, Navesford (p. 365), Pokebroc (p 

 366), Nass, Sutton (p. 367), Albodestowe (p. 368), Wardon (p. 369) 

 Graveshende Falewesle (p. 370), Aylwoldesle (p. 371), Norton (p. 372) 

 Toucestre (p. 373), Cleyle (p. 374), Wymeresle (p. 375), Hecham (p 

 376), Neubotlegrave (p. 377), Gildesboru (p. 378), Mallesle (p. 380) 

 Speleho (p. 381), Anfordesho, Orlingberge (p. 382), Stotfolde (p. 383) 

 Rowell (p. 384), Stokes, Coreby (p. 386), Wylebrok (p. 387), Suth- 

 naveslunt (p. 388), Northnaveslunt (p. 389). The modern equivalents 

 will be found above (p. 297). 



364 



