304 NOTES. 
furores. [6] See Paracelsus, De Vermibus, c. x. (p. 243, ed. 1603): 
Quanguam admitto imaginationem et fidem esse tam potentes, ut per eas nos 
ipsos reddere sanos aut egros valeamus: imo quod maius est, possumus in 
@ternum servari, vel perdi, secundum usum in quem assumte@ fuerint. See 
also Crollii Basilica Chymica, Preef. Admon. pp. 70-77 (ed. 1643). [9] 
miracle-working faith: Comp. Matt. xvii. 20, [10] the secret passages 
of things, &c.: Lat. occultas rerum energias et impressiones, sensuum irra- 
diationes, contagionum de corpore in corpus transmissiones. [16] now 
almost made civil: Lat. facte quasi populares. [26] The reference to the 
Roman church is omitted in the Latin. [32] opposing to: i.e, in oppo- 
sition to, repugnant to. [33] Gen. iii. 19. 
P. 147. [3-6] For this sentence are substituted in the Latin two desi- 
derata on Voluntary Motion, and on Sense and the Sensible, with a dis- 
cussion of the Form of light. [7] De Augm.v.1. [13-16] Lat. Nam 
sensus idola omnigena phantasie tradit, de quibus postea ratio judicat: at 
ratio vicissim idola electa et probata phantasie transmittit, priusquam fiat 
executio decreti. [21] Ovid, Met. ii. 14. [25] Arist. Pol. i. 3. 
P. 148. [1] impressions: ‘impression’ in ed, 1605. The plural seems 
necessary here from what follows, although ‘other’ is used as an adjec- 
tive with singular nouns. See Shakespeare, Cymbeline, iii. 4.144. [3] 
In the Latin this is expressed more clearly ; that where the minds of men 
are in any way wrought upon by rhetorical artifices, the imagination is 
roused till it triumphs over the reason, and as it were does it violence, 
partly by blinding and partly by exciting it. On the office of rhetoric 
see p.177. [6] the former division: i.e. the division which is given at 
p. 85. [8-15] And if it be .. his true place: Omitted in the Latin, [17] 
in the doctrine De Anima: See p. 146. [21] the former division: See 
p. 144. [27] pabulum animi: Cicero, Acad. Queest. ii. 41. Est enim 
animorum ingeniorumque naturale quoddam quasi pabulum consideratio con- 
templatioque nature, Comp. also De Senect. 14. [30] ad ollas carnium: 
to the flesh-pots (of Egypt), Num. xi. 4-6. 
P. 149. [3] dumen siccum: See p. 8,1. 26. [6] Aristotle, De Anima, 
iii. 8. [1] to shoot a nearer shoot: Lat. ut melius quis collimet. [18] 
‘These divisions are adopted from Peter Ramus; the artes logice in- 
cluding what Ramus calls Dialectic and Rhetoric, of which the former 
is divided into Inventio and Judicium, and the latter into Elocutio and 
Pronunciatio.’ Ellis’s note on De Augm. v. 1. [22] De Augm. v. 2. 
P. 150. [6] Arist. Prior. Anal. i. 30; Eth. Mag. i.1.17. [9] See 
Celsus, De Re Medica, i. 1, where he gives it as the opinion of the Em- 
pirics. [12] The reference to the Theztetus is a mistake. It is corrected 
in the Latin to the more general assertion Plato non semel innuit. Bacon 
was perhaps thinking of the Philebus, p.17. [21] Virg. En. xii. 412. 
[28] Virg. Ain. viii. 698. 
P. 151. [1-4] Omitted in the De Augm. but retained in substance in 
