ORTALIDJE INTRODUCTION. 15 



diptera I am acquainted with, I look for the immediate connec- 

 tions of Rhopalomera, I find them unmistakably among the^ 

 South African species of the genus Cestrotus, erected by me. 

 Before all, the striking structure of the head, reminding partly 

 of some genera of JEphydrinidse, partly of the Ortalidae, is very 

 much alike in both genera; this resemblance extends to the 

 mode of pilosity of the face, the shape of the antenna, and the 

 feathery pubescence of the arista. Moreover, the small develop- 

 ment of the metanotum, the shape of the hypopygium, and the 

 structure of the last segments of the female abdomen are very 

 much alike. Now, as the genus Cestrotus, through the inter- 

 mediate steps of Prosopomyia and Physogenia, approaches 

 the family of the Sapromyzidx very closely, I do not find 

 any serious objection to placing Bhopalomera in the same 

 family. That Rhopalomera is one of the extreme genera of the 

 family cannot be doubtful ; the size of the two posterior basal 

 cells especially distinguishes it from all the other genera of 

 Sapromyzidae in a very striking manner, and connects it with 

 the Sciomyzidse ; for this reason it would be also possible, by 

 slightly modifying the definition of the boundary between those 

 two families, to place Rhopalomera among the Sciomyzidse. 

 Those -who will not share either of these two views, and pre- 

 fer to place among the Ortalidae a genus which is far apart from 

 all the Diptera aciphorea in the structure of the ovipositor, may 

 locate Rhopalomera in the vicinity of Richardia, on account of 

 the bareness of the first longitudinal vein, the rounded end of 

 the posterior basal cell, and the spines on the femora. 



Thus, the following diptera, described in Wiedemann's works, 

 belong to the Ortalidce: his species of Ortalis; all the species 

 which he brings in the genera Timia, Ulidia, Cephalia, Platy- 

 stoma, Tetanops, and Pyrgota; in his genus Dacus, the three 

 species in the first division, and Dacus succinctus and bicolor 

 in the second ; in the genus Trypeta, Trypeta ocellata, obscura, 

 picta, Jlexa, trimaculata, basilaris, cyanogaster, and scutellaris; 

 in the genus Tetanocera, his T. bispinosa, and finally, his Cor- 

 dylura podagrica. 



(6.) In Robineau Desvoidy. 



I turn now, not without reluctance, to the writings of R. Des- 

 voidy. In his well-known Essai sur les Myodaires he united 



