CHAPTER VIII 



SYSTEMATIC 

 I. CLASSIFICATION 



A. WORK OF SUCCESSIVE SYSTEMATISTS 



SINCE the time when lichens were first recognized as a separate class 

 as members of the genus Lichen by Tournefort 1 or as "Musco-fungi" 

 by Morison 2 , many schemes of classification have been outlined, and the 

 history of the science of lichenology, as we have seen, is a record of attempts 

 to understand their puzzling structure, and to express that understanding 

 by relating them to each other and to allied classes of plants. The great 

 diversity of opinion in regard to their affinities is directly due to their 

 composite nature. 



a. DILLENIUS AND LlNNAEUS. The first systematists were chiefly im- 

 pressed by their likeness to mosses, hepatics or algae. Dillenius* in the 

 Historia Muscornm grouped them under the moss genera: IV. Usnea, 

 v. Coralloides and vi. Lichenoides. Linnaeus 4 classified them among algae 

 under the general name Lichen, dividing them into eight orders based on 

 thalline characters in all but one instance, the second order being distin- 

 guished from the first by bearing scutellae. The British botanists of the 

 latter part of the eighteenth century Hudson, Lightfoot and others were 

 content to follow Linnaeus and in general adopted his arrangement. 



b. ACHARIUS. Early in the nineteenth century Acharius, the Swedish 

 Lichenologist, worked a revolution in the classification of lichens. He gave 

 first place to the form of the thallus, but he also noted the fundamental 

 differences in fruit-formation: his new system appeared in the Methodus 

 Lichenum* with an introduction explaining the terms he had introduced, 

 many of them in use to this day. 



Diagnoses of twenty-three genera are given with their included species. 

 The work was further extended and emended in Lichenographia Uni- 

 versalis* and in the Synopsis Lichenum 7 . In his final arrangement the 

 family "Lichenes" is divided into four classes, three of which are charac- 

 terized solely by apothecial characters; the fourth class has no apothecia. 

 They are as follows : 



Class I. Idiothalami with three orders, Homogenei, Heterogenei and Hyperogenei : 

 the apothecia differ in texture and colouration from the thallus : Lecidea, Opegrapha, 

 Gyrophora, etc. 



Class II. Coenothalami, with three orders, Phymaloidei, Discoidei and Cephaloidei. 



1 Tournefort 1694. 2 Morison 1699. 3 Dillenius 1741. * Linnaeus 1753. 



6 Acharius 1803. 6 Acharius 1810. 7 Acharius 1814. 



\ 



