4^4 



ANALYTICAL INDEX 



belief in, because of consistency with 

 facts, 268 ; of Mullerian resemblance. 



329-31. 



Examinations, injurious results of, 



197-8- 



EXAMTLKS, STKIKINf., OF MlL- 



i.EKiAN Mimicry in Ntw and Oli> 

 World, X. 331-6. 



Examples, Rlmarkaijlk, ok 

 ^II^!ICKV. X. 367-9. 



IXAMTLE, KKMARKAr.LK, OK 



Mimicry in rAi-iLio dakdanus 

 (mhrope), X. 373-6. 



Excrement of bird, protective 

 resemblance to, 319. 



Exercise, results of, not hereditary, 



136. 



Existence, struggle for, and selec- 

 tion, 96. 



Experience, bearing of Insect 

 Mimicry, &c., upon supposed 

 Hlrei'Itary Transmission of, 

 y. 166-8. 



Experience, the Lamarckian inter- 

 pretation of instinct as inherited, 1 16, 

 154-66; dangers to insects of, 117, 

 118, 154-7; not hereditary, 166-8, 

 316 ; must be acquired by insecti- 

 vorous birds, 26S, 269. 



Experimental Proof of the Pro- 

 tective Value of Colour and 

 Markings in Insects in reference 

 to the Vertebrate Enemies (1887), 

 E. B. Poulton, 230. 



Experimenial Evidence of 

 Special Protection in Apose- 

 m.\tic Forms, X. 316, 317. 



Experimental embryology, 12S-30. 



Experiments, on birds with dis- 

 tasteful insects, see P'inn, F., 269; 

 on Ar/em/a, 73, 74; on power of 

 colour adjustment in larvae and puj^ae, 

 305-7; on seasonal forms of ..SV/i'///^/ 

 H lunar ill ^ 31 1 ; of 'J'cracolus omphale^ 

 311, 312; of — nc/iifh; 311, 312 ; 

 of Be lends sn'crina^ 311, 312; of 

 Precis^ 340; of Jiyblid^ 341; on 

 winter change of Hudson's Bay 

 Lemming, 310. 



External Causes (food, climate, 

 soil, «S:c.) as suggested interpretation 

 of mimicry, 224, 272 ; the theory 

 most commonly substituted for 

 natural selection as cause of mimicry, 

 267, 272 ; theory of, requires trans- 

 mission of acquired characters, 267 ; 

 belief in theory of, due to too exclu- 



sive study of butterflies, 229, 272, 273 ; 

 obviously inapplicable to mimicry 

 between remote species, 229 ; mimicry 

 a special case of protective (pro- 

 cr)'ptic) resemblance, and yet the 

 latter clearly cannot be due to, 226- 

 8 ; various objections to, 227, 229, 

 233, 235-42, 244, 245, 248-50, 260-3, 

 266-8, 270, 273-82. 



Extinction, belief in innate ten- 

 dency towards, lOO. 



Eye, imjiort.mce of, in rapid colour 

 adjustment, 305. 



Eye-like spots on abdomen of 

 mimetic spider, 36S ; oi C/iocrooifnpa 

 caterpillars, 326 ; of Jiyassolinae^ 

 326. 



I^yes of diurnal beetles different 

 from nocturnal, 250. 



* Kyc-spots ' or * ocellated spots' 

 in wet season broods of Sdlyrinac 

 and Nymphdlinac, 210, 211, 326; 

 examined by lizard, 210; pecked by 

 kestrel, 210; concealed during pro- 

 longed rest, 210; divert attention 

 from vital parts, 210, 325, 325 n. i, 

 326 ; of butterflies' wings, value of, 

 281, 282; of Brassolinacj 326; of 

 Morphinac { Tcnan's), 326 ; of Pdpi- 

 lioninac, 326; Tseudaposcmatic in 

 snake-like larvae, 326 ; absent from 

 the chief distasteful butterfly groups, 

 326 ; difficulty in the bionomic classi- 

 fication of, 325, 326. 



Eyton, on fertile pairing of two 

 species of goose, 83. 



F.A., criticism of mimicry in 

 Punch by, 213-15. 



Fabre, on the instinc ts of Fossores, 

 118; on instincts of Fossorial llymcn- 

 optera, 160, 162 ; Lamarck appar- 

 ently confused with Darwin by, 162. 



Facets of eyes of diurnal beetles 

 smaller than nocturnal, 250. 



Factors of Lamarck's theory, 98, 



99- 



Factors of Natural Selection, 95-6; 



suggested by name itself, 105. 



/rt^/, Stauropus, mimicry of ant by, 



253,' 253 (Fig. 2), 254; composite 



mimicry by larva of. 369. 



I'alconet, 289 91. 



Falco subbuteo^ 284. 



fall ax, Myrmecophana, mimicry of, 

 256, 257, 258 (Fig. 5), 280. 



