446 



ANALYTICAL INDEX 



provisional, 328 ; Lcpidoptera, 348, 

 370-6, and Coleoptcra, 348, dis- 

 cussed in relation to Miillerian 

 mimicryand ; Protoi^onius^KXi^Klym- 

 Hiituxc in relation to, 350-4, 372 ; 

 Colaenis in relation to, 334 n. 2 : 

 secondary' mimicry probably charac- 

 teristic of Mullcrian mimicry, 345, 

 345 n. 6 ; mimicr)' of Hymcnoptera 

 in relation to, 376 ; mimicry of 

 snakes in relation to, 376. 



- BtiJrini^ upon Tht'orics of E'l'O- 

 /i///o/t o/: — supposed transmission of 

 experience and, 166-8; mutation 

 and, xxii xxvi ; internal causes sug- 

 gested to account for, 224, 225, 272, 

 but break down when investigated, 

 227 9» 233, 236 9, 241, 245, 247, 

 249, 250, 257, 260-2, 266 8, 270, 273, 

 275, 276, 278-82; external or phy- 

 sico-chemical causes suggested to 

 account for, 224, 272, but break down 

 when investigated, 227-9, 233, 235- 

 42. 244. 245, 24S-50, 260-3, 266-8, 

 270, 273-82; contrasted conditions 

 of model and mimic in same locality, 

 243, 244, 276; sexual selection 

 suggested as cause of, 225, 228, 272, 

 but breaks down when investigated, 

 227, 228, 233, 236, 245, 246, 260, 261, 

 267, 270, 273, 275, 276, 278 82 ; 

 Common Warning Colours ( M iillerian 

 mimicry) and, explained by Natu- 

 ral Selection, Essay Vlll, 220-70: 

 see also Essay IX, 271-82; growth 

 of confidence in interpretation of, 

 by Natural vSelection, 218, 218 

 n. 2, 219, 224 ; facts of, con- 

 sistent with interpretation by, Natural 

 Selection, inconsistent with any 

 other suggested explanation, 227-9, 

 233, 235 42, 245. 246-8, 250, 258- 

 62. 266 70. 273, 275, 276, 278-82; 

 reason for sj)ecial development in 

 S. America of Mullcrian mimicry 

 and, 248. 



— Examples of \—st^ classification 

 of examples of Protective and 

 Mullcrian Mimicry, 383-93. (The 

 examples are not discriminated 

 inasmuch as the interpretation is 

 still under discussion: see p. 328.) 

 Batesian or Miillerian interpreta- 

 tion of examples provisional in 

 many cases, 328 ; the clearest 

 examples of Batesian, 367, 376; 

 development of, in Insecta, 367 ; 



captured on one day, in Hope 

 Department, 248, 249 ; examples in 

 text (except the Leeds series), chiefly 

 selected from Ethiopian and Neo- 

 tropical Regions, 370. 



Mimicry of Advkntitious Ob- 



JKCT (PSEUDALLAI'OSEMATIC RE- 



semhlance), 377 : see also 359. 



Mimicry Aggressiye, and Al- 

 luring Colours (Pseudepise- 

 M A ri c: R i:.s K M hi. A N c E ) , 3 7 7 , 3 7 8 : see 

 alsoclassificationofexamples of mimi- 

 cry, 393; place of in bionomic uses of 

 colour,226; dircctivecharacters(* eye- 

 spots ') may be exam))les of, 325, 326 ; 

 definition of, 358-61 ; false attr.iction 

 is the essential element in, 360 : re- 

 semblance of Volucclla to humble- 

 bees, and Asilidac to their victims 

 probably not examples of, 37S. 



w/rt/.J/y/vz/fj/A/^A?, mimicking ant, 

 254, 255 (Fig. 3). 



fnisippus, Uypohninas^ female of, 

 mimicking L. chrysippus, three 

 forms of female mimicking respec- 

 tively three forms of model, 355, 372 ; 

 three forms of mimetic female tran- 

 sitional, while two out of three corre- 

 sponding forms of model are sharply 

 marked oft", 364, 365 n. i ; probably 

 a Miillerian mimic, and specially de- 

 fended, 215-17, 247; dominance of, 

 216; extends beyonds its model into 

 New World, 216, 247, 347; powers 

 of tlight, 216 ; swarm of, observed in 

 mid-Atlantic, 216 n. 2; conspicuous- 

 ness of male, 216, 217 ; ancestral ap- 

 pearance of male, 216, 245; male pat- 

 tern mimicked bymales of two butter- 

 flies in W. China far beyond its 

 range, 217, 218, 381, 382; mimicry 

 of male perhaps due to attacks of 

 migratory birds, 217, 218, 382; such 

 a cause, if confirmed, would prove 

 growth of mimicry by selection alone, 



361. 



Misseltoe, Darwin on the inade- 

 quacy of Mutation to account for the, 

 xix. 



Misunderstandings arising from 

 term * Mimicry ', 140, 361. 



Mivart, St. George, Darwin's reply 

 to criticisms by, 6. 



ninc)>i€, MeUnaca^ exact resem- 

 blance of Heliconius nionata to, 331 ; 

 parallel transition from barred to 

 black hind wing in both model and 



