EVALUATION OF WOOD PRESERVATIVES 163 



Relatively speaking the soil-block test procedure is much more rapid 

 than the test plot experiments that are to be discussed next, but since 

 the inferences with respect to retention requirements for creosote appear 

 to be the same for the laboratory and the field tests, the former have a 

 direct and immediate application in practical pole preservation. 



BIBLIOGRAPHY 



1. Alleman, G., Quantity and Character of Creosote in Well -Preserved Timbers. 



Circ. 98, Forest Service, U. S. Dept. Agric, May 9, 1907. 



2. AUiot, H., Methode d'Essais des Produits Anticryptogamiques. Inst. Nat. 



du Bois Bull. Techn. 1, 1945. 



3. Amadon, C. H., Recent Observations on the Relation between Penetration, 



Infection and Decay in Creosoted Southern Pine Poles in Line. Am. Wood 

 Preservers' Assoc, Proc, 35, pp. 187-197, 1939. 



4. Baechler, R. H., Relations Between the Chemical Constitution and Toxicity 



of Aliphatic Compounds. Am. Wood Preservers' Assoc, Proc, 43, pp. 94r- 

 111, 1947. 



5. Baechler, R. H., The Toxicity of Preservative Oils Before and After Artificial 



Aging. Am. Wood Preservers' Assoc, Proc, 45, pp. 90-95, 1949. 



6. Bateman, E., Quantity and Quality of Creosote Found in Two Treated Piles 



After Long Service. Circ 199, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory 

 Series, U. S. Dept. Agric, May 22, 1912. 



7. Bateman, E., Coal -Tar and Water-Gas Tar Creosotes: Their Properties and 



Methods of Testing. U. S. Dept. Agric, Bui. No. 1036, pp. 57-65, Oct. 20, 

 1922. 



8. Bateman, E., A Theory on the Mechanism of the Protection of Wood by 



Preservatives. Am. Wood Preservers' Assoc, Proc, 1920, p. 251; 1921, p. 

 506; 1922, p. 70; 1923, p. 136; 1924, p. 33; 1925, p. 22; 1927, p. 41. 



9. Bavendam, W., Die pilzwidrige Wirkung der im Holzschutz benutzten Chemi- 



kalen. Mitteilungen d. Reichsinst. f. Forst und Holzwirtschaft. No. 7, 20 

 pp. Aug., 1948. 



10. Baxter, D. V., Pathology in Forest Practice. 2nd Ed. XI + 601 pp. John Wiley 



and Sons, New York, 1952. 



11. Bertleff, V., Prufung der Fungiziden Eigenschaften Ostrauer Steinkohlenteer 



Impragnierole und ihrer Bestandteile. Chem. Zeitung, 63, p. 438, 1939. 



12. Bescher, R. H., and others. Cooperative Creosote Tests. Am. Wood Preservers' 



Assoc. ,Proc., 46, pp. 68-79, 1950. 



13. Bienfait, J. L., and T. Hof, Buitenproeven met geconserveerde palen. I ste 



mededeling. Circ. 8 Ser. Ill, Conservering en Veredeling No. 3, Central 

 Instituut voor Materiaal Onderzoek. Delft, Holland, Dec, 1948. 



14. Bland, D. E., A Study of Toxicity of Australian Vertical Retort Creosote 



Oils to Lentinus Lepideus Fr., Polystictus Versicolor (L) Fr., and Madison 

 517. Australian Council Sci. and Ind. Jl. 15, pp. 135-146, 1942. 



15. Blew, J. O., Comparison of Wood Preservatives in Stake Tests. Am. Wood 



Preservers' Assoc, Proc, 44, pp. 88-119, 1948. 



16. Blew, J. O., C. A. Richards, and R. H. Baechler, Evaluating Wood Preserva- 



tives. For. Prod. Res. Society, Proc, 5, pp. 230-238, (Wood-block tests, 

 pp. 235-236), 1951. t. o j 



17. Blew, J. O., Comparison of Wood Preservatives in Mississippi Post Study 



(1952 Progress Report). Report No. R1757, Forest Products Laboratory, 

 U. S. Forest Service, Madison, Wis. ,,«^r» t^ 



18. Blew, J. O., Comparison of Wood Preservatives in Stake Tests (1952 Progress 



Report). Report No. D1761, Forest Products Laboratory, U. S. Forest 

 Service, Madison, Wis. ^ 



19. Boyce, J. S., Forest Pathology. 550 p. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., 



New York, 1948. 



