FLEXIBLE REPEATER DESIGN 101 



perfecting both electrical and mechanical designs. Many of these people 

 have furnished the continuing drive and enthusiasm that are so essential 

 for a team of engineers and scientists having divergent interests. It is 

 nearly impossible to assign relative importance to the work of trans- 

 mission engineers, apparatus designers, mathematicians and research 

 scientists in the fields of materials and processes. Equally difficult is 

 any realistic appraisal of the work of all of the technical aides and shop 

 personnel whose contributions are so significant to the final product. 

 The authors of this paper, in reporting the results, therefore acknowl- 

 edge this large volume of effort without listing the many individuals by 

 name. 



REFERENCES 



1. E. T. Mottram, R. J. Halsey, J. W. Emling and R. G. Griffith, Transatlantic 



Telephone Cable S3^stem — Planning and Over-All Performance. Page 7 of 

 this issue. 



2. H. A. Lewis, R. S. Tucker, G. H. Lovell and J. M. Fraser, Sj\stem Design for 



the North Atlantic Link. See page 29 of this issue. 



3. J. J. Gilbert, A Submarine Telephone Cable with Submerged Repeaters, 



B.S.T.J., 30, p. 65, 1951. 



4. G. W. Meszaros and H. H. Spencer, Power Feed Equipment for the North At- 



lantic Link. See page 139 of this issue. 



5. A. W. Lebert, H. B. Fischer and I\L C. Biskeborn, Cable Design and Manu- 



facture for the Transatlantic Submarine Cable System. See page 189 of this 

 issue. 



6. H. W. Bode, Network Analysis and Feedback Amplifier Design, D. Van Nos- 



trand Co., Inc. 



7. H. A. Lamb and W. W. Heffner, Repeater Production for the North Atlantic 



Link. See page 103 of this issue. 



8. J. O. McNally, G. H. Metson, E. A. Veazie and M. F. Holmes, Electron Tubes 



for the Transatlantic Cable Sj'stem. See page 163 of this issue. 



